587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21354818)
1. Comparison of a suspended radiation protection system versus standard lead apron for radiation exposure of a simulated interventionalist.
Marichal DA; Anwar T; Kirsch D; Clements J; Carlson L; Savage C; Rees CR
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 Apr; 22(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 21354818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A novel complete radiation protection system eliminates physician radiation exposure and leaded aprons.
Fattal P; Goldstein JA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 22926976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interventional radiologists: a necessary evolution of leaded protective aprons design.
Guersen J; Cassagnes L; Mechin G; Ravel A; Dumousset E; Boyer L; Chabrot P
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Mar; 24(3):443. PubMed ID: 23433419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical Evaluation of Protective Garments with Respect to Garment Characteristics and Manufacturer Label Information.
Lichliter A; Weir V; Heithaus RE; Gipson S; Syed A; West J; Rees C
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):148-155. PubMed ID: 27789076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recommendations for occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology.
Durán A; Hian SK; Miller DL; Le Heron J; Padovani R; Vano E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 23475846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing strategies for operator eye protection in the interventional radiology suite.
Thornton RH; Dauer LT; Altamirano JP; Alvarado KJ; St Germain J; Solomon SB
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1703-7. PubMed ID: 20920841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield.
Politi L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Nocetti L; Costi T; Monopoli D; Rossi R; Sgura F; Modena MG; Sangiorgi GM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21520391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization lab: shifting the focus from low dose, to "no dose" exposure.
Kumar P; Levy MS
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 82(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 23788383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment.
Klein LW; Miller DL; Balter S; Laskey W; Haines D; Norbash A; Mauro MA; Goldstein JA;
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):147-52; quiz 53. PubMed ID: 19062308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment.
Klein LW; Miller DL; Balter S; Laskey W; Haines D; Norbash A; Mauro MA; Goldstein JA;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Feb; 73(3):432-8. PubMed ID: 19214981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiation exposure as an occupational hazard.
Picano E; Vano E
EuroIntervention; 2012 Oct; 8(6):649-53. PubMed ID: 23086781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Redundant protective barriers: minimizing operator occupational risk.
Challa K; Warren SG; Danak S; Bates MC
J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Jun; 22(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 19298499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A randomized study comparing the use of a pelvic lead shield during trans-radial interventions: Threefold decrease in radiation to the operator but double exposure to the patient.
Musallam A; Volis I; Dadaev S; Abergel E; Soni A; Yalonetsky S; Kerner A; Roguin A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Jun; 85(7):1164-70. PubMed ID: 25510441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [How conservative is routine personal dosimetry monitoring in diagnostic radiology?].
von Boetticher H; Lachmund J; Hoffmann W
Rofo; 2007 Jul; 179(7):728-32. PubMed ID: 17657704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment.
Klein LW; Miller DL; Balter S; Laskey W; Haines D; Norbash A; Mauro MA; Goldstein JA
Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):538-44. PubMed ID: 19188321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Improved radiation protection for medical personnel in angiography and interventional radiology using permanent shielding devices in accordance with section 21 of the Radiography Regulation].
Eder H
Radiologe; 1995 Mar; 35(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 7761591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of a real-time radiation monitoring device on operator radiation exposure during cardiac catheterization: the radiation reduction during cardiac catheterization using real-time monitoring study.
Christopoulos G; Papayannis AC; Alomar M; Kotsia A; Michael TT; Rangan BV; Roesle M; Shorrock D; Makke L; Layne R; Grabarkewitz R; Haagen D; Maragkoudakis S; Mohammad A; Sarode K; Cipher DJ; Chambers CE; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 25423958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures.
Zuguchi M; Chida K; Taura M; Inaba Y; Ebata A; Yamada S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 131(4):531-4. PubMed ID: 18801753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Did you know this about your lead apron?
Tan J; Brock-Utne JG
Anesth Analg; 2013 Aug; 117(2):534-5. PubMed ID: 23881379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Get the Lead off Our Backs!
Rees CR; Duncan BWC
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 29472000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
