586 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21354818)
21. Can Aprons Be Properly Evaluated for Their Protective Quality without In-House Validation?
Weissenborn M; Heithaus E; Weir V; Onofrio A; Rees C
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2016 Dec; 27(12):1933-1935.e2. PubMed ID: 27886959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Impact of an extension tube on operator radiation exposure during coronary procedures performed through the radial approach.
Marque N; Jégou A; Varenne O; Salengro E; Allouch P; Margot O; Spaulding C
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 Nov; 102(11):749-54. PubMed ID: 19944390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Optimizing Radiation Safety in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: A Practical Approach.
Christopoulos G; Makke L; Christakopoulos G; Kotsia A; Rangan BV; Roesle M; Haagen D; Kumbhani DJ; Chambers CE; Kapadia S; Mahmud E; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 26526181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison of dose savings of lead and lightweight aprons for shielding of 99m-Technetium radiation.
Warren-Forward H; Cardew P; Smith B; Clack L; McWhirter K; Johnson S; Wessel K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2007; 124(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17525062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Reduction of radiation exposure by protective measures in heart catheter studies and interventional cardiology].
Prachar H; Dittel M; Kallinger W; Kundtner M; Enenkel W
Z Kardiol; 1989 Apr; 78(4):271-5. PubMed ID: 2735088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. X-Ray protective clothing: does DIN 6857-1 allow an objective comparison between lead-free and lead-composite materials?
Eder H; Schlattl H; Hoeschen C
Rofo; 2010 May; 182(5):422-8. PubMed ID: 20143286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Radiation dose to the interventionalist is directly affected by the operating position.
Ullery BW; Landau B; Wang GJ; Faifrman RM; Woo EY
Vascular; 2014 Apr; 22(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 23518833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Occupational radiation exposure during endovascular aortic procedures.
Patel AP; Gallacher D; Dourado R; Lyons O; Smith A; Zayed H; Waltham M; Sabharwal T; Bell R; Carrell T; Taylor P; Modarai B
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2013 Oct; 46(4):424-30. PubMed ID: 23871303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Live Without Regret.
Marx MV
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):1. PubMed ID: 29471993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of clinical occupational dose reduction effect of a new interventional cardiology shield for radial access combined with a scatter reducing drape.
Gilligan P; Lynch J; Eder H; Maguire S; Fox E; Doyle B; Casserly I; McCann H; Foley D
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(5):935-40. PubMed ID: 26154301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Not all lightweight lead aprons and thyroid shields are alike.
Fakhoury E; Provencher JA; Subramaniam R; Finlay DJ
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jul; 70(1):246-250. PubMed ID: 30292602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Caution: Not seeing may be believing.
Balter S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov; 76(6):835. PubMed ID: 21104773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiation Exposure of Patients and Interventional Radiologists during Prostatic Artery Embolization: A Prospective Single-Operator Study.
Andrade G; Khoury HJ; Garzón WJ; Dubourcq F; Bredow MF; Monsignore LM; Abud DG
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2017 Apr; 28(4):517-521. PubMed ID: 28259503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The occupational effects of interventional cardiology: results from the WIN for Safety survey.
Buchanan GL; Chieffo A; Mehilli J; Mikhail GW; Mauri F; Presbitero P; Grinfeld L; Petronio AS; Skelding KA; Hoye A; Mehran R; Morice MC;
EuroIntervention; 2012 Oct; 8(6):658-63. PubMed ID: 23086783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Head and Neck Radiation Dose and Radiation Safety for Interventional Physicians.
Fetterly K; Schueler B; Grams M; Sturchio G; Bell M; Gulati R
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(5):520-528. PubMed ID: 28279321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Staff doses in interventional radiology: a national survey.
Sánchez RM; Vano E; Fernández JM; Rosales F; Sotil J; Carrera F; García MA; Soler MM; Hernández-Armas J; Martínez LC; Verdú JF
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1496-501. PubMed ID: 22832138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Should We Keep the Lead in the Aprons?
Bartal G; Sailer AM; Vano E
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2018 Mar; 21(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 29471995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Arms and armor.
Balter S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):103. PubMed ID: 22190210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Minimizing radiation exposure to the vascular surgeon.
Haqqani OP; Agarwal PK; Halin NM; Iafrati MD
J Vasc Surg; 2012 Mar; 55(3):799-805. PubMed ID: 22079168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Novel lead-free drape applied to the X-ray detector protects against scatter radiation in the angiography suite.
Irani Z; Alexander B; Zhang D; Liu B; Ghoshhajra B; Oklu R
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1200-8. PubMed ID: 24985717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
