These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21355667)

  • 1. Seeing a phrase "time and again" matters: the role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences.
    Siyanova-Chanturia A; Conklin K; van Heuven WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 May; 37(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 21355667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Production of familiar phrases: Frequency effects in native speakers and second language learners.
    Siyanova-Chanturia A; Janssen N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Dec; 44(12):2009-2018. PubMed ID: 29648865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The sentence-composition effect: processing of complex sentences depends on the configuration of common noun phrases versus unusual noun phrases.
    Johnson ML; Lowder MW; Gordon PC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):707-24. PubMed ID: 21767046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Memory for non-native language: the role of lexical processing in the retention of surface form.
    Sampaio C; Konopka AE
    Memory; 2013; 21(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 23240966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of parafoveal processing within and across words in reading: evidence from the boundary paradigm.
    Häikiö T; Bertram R; Hyönä J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1982-98. PubMed ID: 20336584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Native and non-native reading of sentences: an fMRI experiment.
    Rüschemeyer SA; Zysset S; Friederici AD
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 31(1):354-65. PubMed ID: 16427323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orthography and the development of reading processes: an eye-movement study of Chinese and English.
    Feng G; Miller K; Shu H; Zhang H
    Child Dev; 2009; 80(3):720-35. PubMed ID: 19489899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.
    Kennedy A; Pynte J
    Vision Res; 2005 Jan; 45(2):153-68. PubMed ID: 15581917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Collocational frequency and context effects on idiom processing in advanced L2 speakers.
    Milburn E; Vulchanova M; Vulchanov V
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2021 Jun; 75(2):169-174. PubMed ID: 33764101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and older readers.
    Rayner K; Reichle ED; Stroud MJ; Williams CC; Pollatsek A
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):448-65. PubMed ID: 16953709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eye movements when reading disappearing text: is there a gap effect in reading?
    Liversedge SP; Rayner K; White SJ; Vergilino-Perez D; Findlay JM; Kentridge RW
    Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):1013-24. PubMed ID: 15031094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners.
    Dowens MG; Vergara M; Barber HA; Carreiras M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Aug; 22(8):1870-87. PubMed ID: 19580390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Case-marking in the parsing of complement sentences: evidence from eye movements.
    Traxler MJ; Pickering MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Nov; 49(4):991-1004. PubMed ID: 8962544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust Processing Advantage for Binomial Phrases with Variant Conjunctions.
    Chantavarin S; Morgan E; Ferreira F
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Sep; 46(9):e13187. PubMed ID: 36036152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Language, thought, and real nouns.
    Barner D; Inagaki S; Li P
    Cognition; 2009 Jun; 111(3):329-44. PubMed ID: 19345937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: investigating the subordinate-bias effect.
    Sereno SC; O'Donnell PJ; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):335-50. PubMed ID: 16634674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does bilingualism change native-language reading? Cognate effects in a sentence context.
    Van Assche E; Duyck W; Hartsuiker RJ; Diependaele K
    Psychol Sci; 2009 Aug; 20(8):923-7. PubMed ID: 19549082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variation in language networks in monolingual and bilingual English speakers: consequences for language mapping for surgical preplanning.
    Schafer RJ; Constable RT
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2009 Nov; 31(8):945-54. PubMed ID: 19370440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is there a neighborhood frequency effect in English? Evidence from reading and lexical decision.
    Sears CR; Campbell CR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):1040-62. PubMed ID: 16846296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.