These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2135591)

  • 1. [The bionator with extraoral traction--the Wurzburg concept. 1].
    Witt E; Sahm G; Hevia R
    Prakt Kieferorthop; 1990 Nov; 4(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 2135591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
    Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Control of vertical dimension in the treatment of Class II malocclusion using a combined activator and extraoral traction appliance].
    Chabre C
    Orthod Fr; 1989; 60 Pt 2():617-33. PubMed ID: 2490243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment effects of headgear biteplane and bionator appliances.
    Almeida-Pedrin RR; Almeida MR; Almeida RR; Pinzan A; Ferreira FP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Aug; 132(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 17693369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Activator versus cervical headgear: superimpositional cephalometric comparison.
    Haralabakis NB; Halazonetis DJ; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 12637902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Timing of Class II treatment: skeletal changes comparing 1-phase and 2-phase treatment.
    Dolce C; McGorray SP; Brazeau L; King GJ; Wheeler TT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):481-9. PubMed ID: 17920501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Treatment of Class 2-high Angle cases using the combined activator-occipital headgear].
    Dinçer M
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):114-24. PubMed ID: 2489131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of cervical headgear and fixed appliances on the space available for maxillary second molars.
    Piva LM; Brito HH; Leite HR; O'Reilly M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 16168333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of the changes occurring in the vertical direction of the face in cases treated with activator + occipital headgear combination].
    Altuğ Z; Işeri H; Bayazit Z; Gögen H
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Nov; 2(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 2489156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distal movement of the maxillary molar using an active removable appliance and extraoral force: a case report.
    Johnson BE
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Jan; 25(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 8190880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of activator and activator + anterior high-pull headgear on the growth direction of Class 2 cases].
    Uner O; Akkaya S; Buyruk F
    Turk Ortodonti Derg; 1989 Apr; 2(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 2489150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects.
    Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Feb; 28(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 16093256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Contribution to the treatment of the Class II/1 by means of the activator-headgear combination].
    Andrik P
    Stomatol DDR; 1988 Jun; 38(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 3256947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research efficacy trials of bionator class II treatment: a review.
    Jacobs T; Sawaengkit P
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Dec; 72(6):571-5. PubMed ID: 12518950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Treatment of a basal and dental Class II malocclusion in mixed dentition, with functional appliances and extraoral traction].
    Viora E; Mossino ML; Ramirez Velarde JC; Guglielmino D
    Minerva Ortognatod; 1989; 7(3-4):117-32. PubMed ID: 2640572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The headgear: an effective functional appliance adjunct to treatment of the common Class II malocclusion in the adolescent--a clinical perspective.
    DeAngelis V
    J Mass Dent Soc; 2009; 58(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 19526912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Class II activator and Class II activator high-pull headgear combination on the mandible: a 3-dimensional finite element stress analysis study.
    Ulusoy C; Darendeliler N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):490.e9-15. PubMed ID: 18405811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.