These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2135602)
1. An index for objective evaluation of the soft tissue profile. Abe Y; Haebara T; Hanada K Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1990; 5(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 2135602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery. Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements. Anić-Milosević S; Lapter-Varga M; Slaj M Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18263886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery. Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of dental and skeletal movements on the facial profile within the framework of orthodontic and surgical treatments. Teitelbaum V; Balon-Perin A; De Maertelaer V; Daelemans P; Glineur R Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 12099320 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients. Stephens CK; Boley JC; Behrents RG; Alexander RG; Buschang PH Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Oct; 128(4):450-7. PubMed ID: 16214626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anteroposterior lip positions of the most-favored Japanese facial profiles. Ioi H; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 16102406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dental Aesthetic Index scores and perception of personal dental appearance among Turkish university students. Hamamci N; Başaran G; Uysal E Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):168-73. PubMed ID: 19126820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier. Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of tegumental changes after skeletal repositioning in orthodontic surgery]. Madaro E; Tarello F; Fasolis M; Schellino E; Benech A Minerva Stomatol; 1997; 46(7-8):375-80. PubMed ID: 9297072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship of 2 professional occlusal indexes with patients' perceptions of aesthetics, function, speech, and orthodontic treatment need. Shue-Te Yeh M; Koochek AR; Vlaskalic V; Boyd R; Richmond S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 11029738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging. Giangreco TA; Forbes DP; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9082009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness. Tulloch C; Phillips C; Dann C Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 8301165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of soft tissue references for anteroposterior measurement of dental bases. Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Colombo A; Ciusa V; Bignotto M Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 9835820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Cephalometric evaluation of soft tissue in orthodontic treatment planning]. Currò G; Seidita R Mondo Ortod; 1989; 14(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 2639232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Harmonized profiloplasty using balanced angular profile analysis. Park HS; Rhee SC; Kang SR; Lee JH Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 15156291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment. Baker BW; Woods MG Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft-tissue profile changes concurrent with the orthodontic treatment. Attarzadeh F; Adenwalla ST Int J Orthod; 1984 Dec; 22(4):4-13. PubMed ID: 6597812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs. Michiels G; Sather AH Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]