These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21356097)

  • 1. The role of the user within the medical device design and development process: medical device manufacturers' perspectives.
    Money AG; Barnett J; Kuljis J; Craven MP; Martin JL; Young T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2011 Feb; 11():15. PubMed ID: 21356097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. User involvement in healthcare technology development and assessment: structured literature review.
    Shah SG; Robinson I
    Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv; 2006; 19(6-7):500-15. PubMed ID: 17100220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits of and barriers to involving users in medical device technology development and evaluation.
    Shah SG; Robinson I
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 17234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing medical device technologies from users' perspectives: a theoretical framework for involving users in the development process.
    Shah SG; Robinson I; AlShawi S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):514-21. PubMed ID: 19845981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study.
    Martin JL; Barnett J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2012 Jul; 12():74. PubMed ID: 22812565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Issues and challenges of involving users in medical device development.
    Bridgelal Ram M; Grocott PR; Weir HC
    Health Expect; 2008 Mar; 11(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 18275403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Capturing Essential Information to Achieve Safe Interoperability.
    Weininger S; Jaffe MB; Rausch T; Goldman JM
    Anesth Analg; 2017 Jan; 124(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 27387840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. User knowledge factors that hinder the design of new home healthcare devices: investigating thirty-eight devices and their manufacturers.
    Yang F; Al Mahmud A; Wang T
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 May; 21(1):166. PubMed ID: 34020640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design and implementation of a portal for the medical equipment market: MEDICOM.
    Palamas S; Kalivas D; Panou-Diamandi O; Zeelenberg C; van Nimwegen C
    J Med Internet Res; 2001; 3(4):E32. PubMed ID: 11772547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experiences of user involvement in mental health settings: User motivations and benefits.
    Neech SGB; Scott H; Priest HM; Bradley EJ; Tweed AE
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2018 Jun; 25(5-6):327-337. PubMed ID: 29753313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementing the new quality system requirements: design controls.
    Stoeger KJ
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 9099433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human factors in the design of medical devices - Approaches to meeting international standards in the European Union and USA.
    Privitera MB; Evans M; Southee D
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):251-263. PubMed ID: 27890135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Enabling Access to Medical and Health Education in Rwanda Using Mobile Technology: Needs Assessment for the Development of Mobile Medical Educator Apps.
    Rusatira JC; Tomaszewski B; Dusabejambo V; Ndayiragije V; Gonsalves S; Sawant A; Mumararungu A; Gasana G; Amendezo E; Haake A; Mutesa L
    JMIR Med Educ; 2016 Jun; 2(1):e7. PubMed ID: 27731861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A user-centred approach to requirements elicitation in medical device development: a case study from an industry perspective.
    Martin JL; Clark DJ; Morgan SP; Crowe JA; Murphy E
    Appl Ergon; 2012 Jan; 43(1):184-90. PubMed ID: 21636072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FRAMEWORK FOR USER INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AT THE LOCAL LEVEL: VIEWS OF HEALTH MANAGERS, USER REPRESENTATIVES, AND CLINICIANS.
    Gagnon MP; Desmartis M; Gagnon J; St-Pierre M; Rhainds M; Coulombe M; Tantchou MD; Légaré F
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(1-2):68-77. PubMed ID: 25952585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. User profiles and personas in the design and development of consumer health technologies.
    LeRouge C; Ma J; Sneha S; Tolle K
    Int J Med Inform; 2013 Nov; 82(11):e251-68. PubMed ID: 21481635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. HOSPITAL-BASED HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT FOR THE ADOPTION OF INNOVATIVE MEDICAL DEVICES WITHIN FRENCH HOSPITALS: OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES FOR INDUSTRY.
    Dutot C; Mercier G; Borget I; de Sauvebeuf C; Martelli N
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2017 Jan; 33(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 28578711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.
    Hijjeh M; Al Shaikh L; Alinier G; Selwood D; Malmstrom F; Hassan IF
    Qatar Med J; 2019; 2019(2):2. PubMed ID: 31763205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Integration of human factors and ergonomics during medical device design and development: it's all about communication.
    Vincent CJ; Li Y; Blandford A
    Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 23778022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.