These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2135665)

  • 1. Carbon fibre reinforced osteotomy wafers.
    Telfer MR; Page KB
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1990 Jun; 28(3):210-1. PubMed ID: 2135665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new appliance for condylar positioning (clamp system).
    Harada K; Okada Y; Nagura H; Enomoto S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Oct; 24(5):342-3. PubMed ID: 8627098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pegs for inferior repositioning of the maxilla.
    Ilankovan V; Payne G
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1991 Aug; 29(4):284. PubMed ID: 1911682
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical wafers: a comparative study.
    Bamber MA; Vachiramon A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 May; 6(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 15915209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flexural properties of glass fibre reinforced acrylic resin polymers.
    Tacir IH; Kama JD; Zortuk M; Eskimez S
    Aust Dent J; 2006 Mar; 51(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 16669478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A custom acrylic template for the transfer of reference lines and osteotomy from model surgery to the patient: an adjunct for Le Fort I osteotomy.
    LaBanc JP; Kendrick J
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1987; 2(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 3483179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acrylic resins reinforced with woven highly drawn linear polyethylene fibres. 3. Mechanical properties and further aspects of denture construction.
    Ladizesky NH; Pang MK; Chow TW; Ward IM
    Aust Dent J; 1993 Feb; 38(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 8447769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reinforcement of acrylic resin denture base material with metal or fibre strengtheners.
    Vallittu PK; Lassila VP
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 May; 19(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 1500965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of impact strength of acrylic resin reinforced with kevlar and polyethylene fibres.
    Kamath G; Bhargava K
    Indian J Dent Res; 2002; 13(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 12420577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of the addition of different fibres on the transverse and impact strength of acrylic resin denture base material.
    Rahamneh A; Jagger DC; Harrison A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2003 Jun; 11(2):75-81. PubMed ID: 12868211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new technique for the construction of interocclusal wafers in orthognathic surgery.
    Sunderland T; Bainton R
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1995 Oct; 33(5):321-2. PubMed ID: 8555152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the flexural strength and elastic modulus of resins used for temporary restorations reinforced with particulate glass fibre.
    Orsi IA; Soares RG; Villabona CA; Panzeri H
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e63-8. PubMed ID: 20735489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of two fibre impregnation methods on the cytotoxicity of a glass and carbon fibre-reinforced acrylic resin denture base material on oral epithelial cells and fibroblasts.
    Sipahi C; Ozen J; Ural AU; Dalkiz M; Beydemir B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Sep; 33(9):666-73. PubMed ID: 16922740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of check-bite registration and centric condylar position.
    Utz KH; Müller F; Lückerath W; Fuss E; Koeck B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 May; 29(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 12028494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of interface adhesion, water immersion and anatomical notches on the mechanical properties of denture base resins reinforced with continuous high performance polyethylene fibres.
    Ladizesky NH; Chow TW
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Aug; 37(4):277-89. PubMed ID: 1444947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A surgical template for aligned placement of the osseointegrated implant.
    Johnson CM; Lewandowski JA; McKinney JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Jun; 59(6):684-8. PubMed ID: 3165455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How accurate are rapid prototyped (RP) final orthognathic surgical wafers? A pilot study.
    Shqaidef A; Ayoub AF; Khambay BS
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 52(7):609-14. PubMed ID: 24933576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A modified occlusal splint for segmental osteotomy fixation.
    Super S
    J Oral Surg; 1977 Mar; 35(3):238. PubMed ID: 264532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A method to remold worn acrylic resin posterior denture teeth and restore lost vertical dimension of occlusion.
    Hayakawa I; Hirano S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Feb; 69(2):234-6. PubMed ID: 8429518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Glass fibre reinforced acrylic resin complete dentures: a 5-year clinical study.
    Goguţă LM; Bratu D; Jivănescu A; Erimescu R; Mărcăuţeanu C
    Gerodontology; 2012 Mar; 29(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 21696441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.