118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21356855)
1. Using BLOSUM in Sequence Alignments.
Mount DW
CSH Protoc; 2008 Jun; 2008():pdb.top39. PubMed ID: 21356855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the PAM and BLOSUM Amino Acid Substitution Matrices.
Mount DW
CSH Protoc; 2008 Jun; 2008():pdb.ip59. PubMed ID: 21356840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A transition probability model for amino acid substitutions from blocks.
Veerassamy S; Smith A; Tillier ER
J Comput Biol; 2003; 10(6):997-1010. PubMed ID: 14980022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using PAM Matrices in Sequence Alignments.
Mount DW
CSH Protoc; 2008 Jun; 2008():pdb.top38. PubMed ID: 21356854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ranging of amino acids substitution matrices of various types in accordance with the alignment accuracy criterion.
Polyanovsky V; Lifanov A; Esipova N; Tumanyan V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Sep; 21(Suppl 11):294. PubMed ID: 32921315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Selecting the Right Similarity-Scoring Matrix.
Pearson WR
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2013; 43():3.5.1-3.5.9. PubMed ID: 24509512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robust sequence alignment using evolutionary rates coupled with an amino acid substitution matrix.
Ndhlovu A; Hazelhurst S; Durand PM
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 16():255. PubMed ID: 26269100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A test of the markov model of evolution in proteins.
Mount DW
CSH Protoc; 2008 Jun; 2008():pdb.ip58. PubMed ID: 21356839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance evaluation of amino acid substitution matrices.
Henikoff S; Henikoff JG
Proteins; 1993 Sep; 17(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 8234244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the significance of sequence alignments when using multiple scoring matrices.
Frommlet F; Futschik A; Bogdan M
Bioinformatics; 2004 Apr; 20(6):881-7. PubMed ID: 14751984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Amino acid substitution scoring matrices specific to intrinsically disordered regions in proteins.
Trivedi R; Nagarajaram HA
Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16380. PubMed ID: 31704957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addressing inaccuracies in BLOSUM computation improves homology search performance.
Hess M; Keul F; Goesele M; Hamacher K
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 17():189. PubMed ID: 27122148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Amino acid substitution matrices from an artificial neural network model.
Lin K; May AC; Taylor WR
J Comput Biol; 2001; 8(5):471-81. PubMed ID: 11694178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Substitution scoring matrices for proteins - An overview.
Trivedi R; Nagarajaram HA
Protein Sci; 2020 Nov; 29(11):2150-2163. PubMed ID: 32954566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Novel protein weight matrix generated from amino acid indices.
Chrysostomou C; Seker H
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015 Aug; 2015():8181-4. PubMed ID: 26738193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Large-Scale Sequence Comparison.
Lal D; Verma M
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1525():191-224. PubMed ID: 27896723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SubVis: an interactive R package for exploring the effects of multiple substitution matrices on pairwise sequence alignment.
Barlowe S; Coan HB; Youker RT
PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3492. PubMed ID: 28674656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Substitution matrices of residue triplets derived from protein blocks.
Liu X; Zhao YP
J Comput Biol; 2010 Dec; 17(12):1679-87. PubMed ID: 21128854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selecting the right protein-scoring matrix.
Wheeler D
Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2002 Nov; Chapter 3():Unit 3.5. PubMed ID: 18792939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Scoredist: a simple and robust protein sequence distance estimator.
Sonnhammer EL; Hollich V
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():108. PubMed ID: 15857510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
