These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 213577)

  • 21. Evaluating department chairmen's performance in medical group practices.
    Pasternak DP; Smith HL
    Group Health J; 1984; 5(2):6-13. PubMed ID: 10316079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance appraisal--a participative approach.
    Phillips M
    Hosp Adm Can; 1977 Jun; 19(6):68, 70. PubMed ID: 10241968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Criterion referenced performance appraisal system: a blueprint.
    Sudela KD; Landureth L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Mar; 18(3):54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 3645448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating clinical competency in nursing.
    Lunde KF; Durbin-Lafferty E
    Nurs Manage; 1986 Aug; 17(8):47-50. PubMed ID: 3637728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of a job-specific, criteria-based performance appraisal tool for staff pharmacists.
    Hoffman RP
    Hosp Pharm; 1986 Mar; 21(3):220-6. PubMed ID: 10275584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance appraisal blues: who should get the pink slip?
    Riordan J
    Respir Ther; 1981; 11(6):107-8, 110-11. PubMed ID: 10253943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Being objective about appraisal.
    McKenzie I
    Nurs Times; 1985 Dec 18-31; 81(51):25-6. PubMed ID: 3853781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [A method of work performance appraisal at the Pediatric Department in Levoca].
    Ivicic L; Kacejová R
    Cesk Pediatr; 1987 Mar; 42(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 3581272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Performance evaluation of staff nurses.
    Goodykoontz L
    Superv Nurse; 1981 Aug; 12(8):39-43. PubMed ID: 6910946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Staff evaluation: an assessment of approaches.
    Calkin JD
    Health Care Superv; 1984 Jul; 2(4):68-78. PubMed ID: 10266420
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A better way to evaluate job performance.
    Thomas DO
    RN; 1987 Jul; 50(7):15-6. PubMed ID: 3648915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The evaluation-notation].
    Mizrahi MR
    Soins Gynecol Obstet Pueric Pediatr; 1990; (109-110):30-6. PubMed ID: 2389233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Responding to the codependent employee.
    Davidhizar R
    Health Care Superv; 1992 Jun; 10(4):36-44. PubMed ID: 10171014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. How formal appraisal systems work.
    Pucilo NP
    Respir Ther; 1984; 14(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 10265552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Productivity monitoring of the non-technical staff.
    Fodor J; Salvekar A
    Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 10281128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluating the performance of the chief executive officer.
    Harvey JD
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1978; 23(2):5-21. PubMed ID: 10306901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. SD and PR. The appraisal interview: six common situations.
    Stewart AM
    Nurs Times; 1978 Apr; 74(16):657-8. PubMed ID: 652531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [An attempt at objective evaluation].
    Rev Infirm; 1987 Sep; 37(14):31-3. PubMed ID: 3671984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. SD and PR. The problems of measuring performance.
    Stewart AM
    Nurs Times; 1978 Apr; 74(16):659-61. PubMed ID: 652532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Social attraction and choice among psychiatric patients and staff: a review.
    Doherty EG
    J Health Soc Behav; 1971 Dec; 12(4):279-90. PubMed ID: 4943152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.