203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21358903)
1. The effects of variable-time delivery of food items and praise on problem behavior reinforced by escape.
Lomas JE; Fisher WW; Kelley ME
J Appl Behav Anal; 2010; 43(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 21358903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of variable-time versus contingent reinforcement delivery on problem behavior maintained by escape.
Lomas Mevers JE; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; Fredrick LD
J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):277-92. PubMed ID: 24764205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Further examination of factors that influence preference for positive versus negative reinforcement.
Kodak T; Lerman DC; Volkert VM; Trosclair N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2007; 40(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 17471792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of differential negative reinforcement of other behavior and noncontingent escape on compliance.
Kodak T; Miltenberger RG; Romaniuk C
J Appl Behav Anal; 2003; 36(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 14596581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Further evaluations of functional communication training and chained schedules of reinforcement to treat multiple functions of challenging behavior.
Falcomata TS; Muething CS; Gainey S; Hoffman K; Fragale C
Behav Modif; 2013 Nov; 37(6):723-46. PubMed ID: 23990645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Functional communication training and chained schedules of reinforcement to treat challenging behavior maintained by terminations of activity interruptions.
Falcomata TS; Roane HS; Muething CS; Stephenson KM; Ing AD
Behav Modif; 2012 Sep; 36(5):630-49. PubMed ID: 22327267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Food selectivity and problem behavior in children with developmental disabilities. Analysis and intervention.
Levin L; Carr EG
Behav Modif; 2001 Jul; 25(3):443-70. PubMed ID: 11428248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noncontingent escape as treatment for self-injurious behavior maintained by negative reinforcement.
Vollmer TR; Marcus BA; Ringdahl JE
J Appl Behav Anal; 1995; 28(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 7706146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment and treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from attention and access to tangible items.
Hagopian LP; Wilson DM; Wilder DA
J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 11421317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of differential reinforcement and noncontingent reinforcement to treat food selectivity in a child with autism.
Allison J; Wilder DA; Chong I; Lugo A; Pike J; Rudy N
J Appl Behav Anal; 2012; 45(3):613-7. PubMed ID: 23060675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic examination of different parameters of presession exposure to tangible stimuli that maintain problem behavior.
O'Reilly M; Lang R; Davis T; Rispoli M; Machalicek W; Sigafoos J; Lancioni G; Didden R
J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(4):773-83. PubMed ID: 22102760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of fixed-time and contingent schedules of negative reinforcement on compliance and aberrant behavior.
Reed GK; Ringdahl JE; Wacker DP; Barretto A; Andelman MS
Res Dev Disabil; 2005; 26(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 15668078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment of automatically reinforced object mouthing with noncontingent reinforcement and response blocking: experimental analysis and social validation.
Carr JE; Dozier CL; Patel MR; Adams AN; Martin N
Res Dev Disabil; 2002; 23(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 12071394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combining noncontingent reinforcement and differential reinforcement schedules as treatment for aberrant behavior.
Marcus BA; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 1996; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 8881343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Separate and combined effects of visual schedules and extinction plus differential reinforcement on problem behavior occasioned by transitions.
Waters MB; Lerman DC; Hovanetz AN
J Appl Behav Anal; 2009; 42(2):309-13. PubMed ID: 19949517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sound attenuation and preferred music in the treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from noise.
Kettering TL; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; LaRue RH
J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Jul; 51(3):687-693. PubMed ID: 29876921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing potency of high- and low-preference reinforcers with respect to response rate and response patterns.
Penrod B; Wallace MD; Dyer EJ
J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(2):177-88. PubMed ID: 18595282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of aggression evoked by sounds using noncontingent reinforcement and time-out.
Dupuis DL; Lerman DC; Tsami L; Shireman ML
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):669-74. PubMed ID: 26118940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.
Slocum SK; Vollmer TR
J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 25969379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of accumulated and distributed reinforcement periods with children exhibiting escape-maintained problem behavior.
Fulton CJ; Tiger JH; Meitzen HM; Effertz HM
J Appl Behav Anal; 2020 Apr; 53(2):782-795. PubMed ID: 31414480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
