These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

515 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21359509)

  • 1. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T; Doi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
    Widmer KH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The safe-zones for combined cup and neck anteversions that fulfill the essential range of motion and their optimum combination in total hip replacements.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1315-23. PubMed ID: 15894324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of the oscillation angle and the neck anteversion of the prosthesis on the cup safe-zone that fulfills the criteria for range of motion in total hip replacements. The required oscillation angle for an acceptable cup safe-zone.
    Yoshimine F
    J Biomech; 2005 Jan; 38(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 15519347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Femur first in hip arthroplasty--the concept of combined anteversion].
    Sendtner E; Müller M; Winkler R; Wörner M; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Mar; 148(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 20376760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: the effect of cup position and component size on range of motion to impingement.
    Williams D; Royle M; Norton M
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Jan; 24(1):144-51. PubMed ID: 18823742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Femoral head to neck offset after hip resurfacing is critical for range of motion.
    Girard J; Krantz N; Bocquet D; Wavreille G; Migaud H
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Feb; 27(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 21925779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer simulation based on in vivo kinematics of a replaced hip during chair-rising for elucidating target cup and stem positioning with a safety range of hip rotation.
    Shiomoto K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Higaki H; Hara D; Gondo H; Komiyama K; Yoshimoto K; Harada S; Nakashima Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2022 Jan; 91():105537. PubMed ID: 34847472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios.
    D'Lima DD; Urquhart AG; Buehler KO; Walker RH; Colwell CW
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Mar; 82(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 10724224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
    Widmer KH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.
    Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Taga T; Hasegawa K; Inoue D; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Tsuchiya H
    Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cup safe zone and optimal stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty for patients with highly required range of motion.
    Habe Y; Hamada H; Uemura K; Takashima K; Ando W; Sugano N
    J Orthop Res; 2024 Jun; 42(6):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 38084832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of optimal implant alignment in total hip arthroplasty based on postoperative range of motion simulation.
    Harada S; Hamai S; Motomura G; Ikemura S; Fujii M; Kawahara S; Sato T; Hara D; Nakashima Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2022 Feb; 92():105555. PubMed ID: 35026659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acetabular Cup Anteversion and Inclination in Hip Range of Motion to Impingement.
    McCarthy TF; Alipit V; Nevelos J; Elmallah RK; Mont MA
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):264-8. PubMed ID: 27067753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The association between Femoral Tilt and impingement-free range-of-motion in total hip arthroplasty.
    Renkawitz T; Haimerl M; Dohmen L; Gneiting S; Lechler P; Woerner M; Springorum HR; Weber M; Sussmann P; Sendtner E; Grifka J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 May; 13():65. PubMed ID: 22559740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influences of head/neck ratio and femoral antetorsion on the safe-zone of operative acetabular orientations in total hip arthroplasty.
    Li YJ; Yang GJ; Zhang LC; Cai CY; Wu LJ
    Chin J Traumatol; 2010 Aug; 13(4):206-11. PubMed ID: 20670576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo kinematic analysis of replaced hip during stationary cycling and computer simulation of optimal cup positioning against prosthetic impingement.
    Komiyama K; Hamai S; Ikebe S; Yoshimoto K; Higaki H; Shiomoto K; Gondo H; Hara D; Wang Y; Nakashima Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2019 Aug; 68():175-181. PubMed ID: 31229697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hip flexion after Birmingham hip resurfacing: role of cup anteversion, anterior femoral head-neck offset, and head-neck ratio.
    Malviya A; Lingard EA; Malik A; Bowman R; Holland JP
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):387-91. PubMed ID: 19285379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.