These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21360120)

  • 1. Biomechanical evaluation of regenerating long bone by nanoindentation.
    Ishimoto T; Nakano T; Yamamoto M; Tabata Y
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2011 Apr; 22(4):969-76. PubMed ID: 21360120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationships of viscosity with contact hardness and modulus of bone matrix measured by nanoindentation.
    Kim DG; Huja SS; Lee HR; Tee BC; Hueni S
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Feb; 132(2):024502. PubMed ID: 20370248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An improved method for the measurement of mechanical properties of bone by nanoindentation.
    Tang B; Ngan AH; Lu WW
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2007 Sep; 18(9):1875-81. PubMed ID: 17522963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precision of nanoindentation protocols for measurement of viscoelasticity in cortical and trabecular bone.
    Isaksson H; Nagao S; Małkiewicz M; Julkunen P; Nowak R; Jurvelin JS
    J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(12):2410-7. PubMed ID: 20478559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct comparison of nanoindentation and macroscopic measurements of bone viscoelasticity.
    Shepherd TN; Zhang J; Ovaert TC; Roeder RK; Niebur GL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2011 Nov; 4(8):2055-62. PubMed ID: 22098905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Estimations of mechanical properties of bones using nanoindentation].
    Sakamoto M
    Clin Calcium; 2016 Jan; 26(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 26728534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating differences in Young's Modulus of regenerated and uninjured mouse digit bone through microCT density-based calculation and nanoindentation testing.
    Hoffseth KF; Busse E; Lacey M; Sammarco MC
    J Biomech; 2022 Oct; 143():111271. PubMed ID: 36095912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques.
    Turner CH; Rho J; Takano Y; Tsui TY; Pharr GM
    J Biomech; 1999 Apr; 32(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 10213035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An application of nanoindentation technique to measure bone tissue Lamellae properties.
    Hoffler CE; Guo XE; Zysset PK; Goldstein SA
    J Biomech Eng; 2005 Dec; 127(7):1046-53. PubMed ID: 16502646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of material parameters based on Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion for bisphosphonate treated canine vertebral cancellous bone.
    Wang X; Allen MR; Burr DB; Lavernia EJ; Jeremić B; Fyhrie DP
    Bone; 2008 Oct; 43(4):775-80. PubMed ID: 18599390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The viscoelastic behavior of dental adhesives: a nanoindentation study.
    Sadr A; Shimada Y; Lu H; Tagami J
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 18579198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characterization of the elastic and viscoelastic properties of dentin by a nanoindentation creep test.
    Chuang SF; Lin SY; Wei PJ; Han CF; Lin JF; Chang HC
    J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):2155-61. PubMed ID: 25911251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation of mechanical properties of diatom frustules using nanoindentation.
    Subhash G; Yao S; Bellinger B; Gretz MR
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2005 Jan; 5(1):50-6. PubMed ID: 15762160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age-specific profiles of tissue-level composition and mechanical properties in murine cortical bone.
    Raghavan M; Sahar ND; Kohn DH; Morris MD
    Bone; 2012 Apr; 50(4):942-53. PubMed ID: 22285889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Localized sclerotic bone response demonstrated reduced nanomechanical creep properties.
    Chen X; Goh JC; Teoh SH; De SD; Soong R; Lee T
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Jan; 17():198-208. PubMed ID: 23127639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of surface roughness and maximum load on the mechanical properties of cancellous bone measured by nanoindentation.
    Donnelly E; Baker SP; Boskey AL; van der Meulen MC
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 May; 77(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 16392128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comment on "Nanoindentation and whole-bone bending estimates of material properties in bones from senescence accelerated mouse SAMP6".
    Malzbender J
    J Biomech; 2005 May; 38(5):1191-2; author reply 1193. PubMed ID: 15797600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mechanical properties of OI type III bone tissue measured by nanoindentation.
    Fan Z; Smith PA; Eckstein EC; Harris GF
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Oct; 79(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 16758461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanical properties of organically modified silicates for bone regeneration.
    Manzano M; Salinas AJ; Gil FJ; Vallet-Regí M
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2009 Sep; 20(9):1795-801. PubMed ID: 19404723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterization of the linearly viscoelastic behavior of human tympanic membrane by nanoindentation.
    Daphalapurkar NP; Dai C; Gan RZ; Lu H
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2009 Jan; 2(1):82-92. PubMed ID: 19627811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.