135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21361181)
21. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dual-energy approach to contrast-enhanced mammography using the balanced filter method: spectral optimization and preliminary phantom measurement.
Saito M
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4236-46. PubMed ID: 18072488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dose Optimization for Computed Tomography Localizer Radiographs for Low-Dose Lung Computed Tomography Examinations.
Schmidt BT; Hupfer M; Saltybaeva N; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Invest Radiol; 2017 Feb; 52(2):81-86. PubMed ID: 27518213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The upper limits of the SNR in radiography and CT with polyenergetic x-rays.
Shikhaliev PM
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(18):5317-39. PubMed ID: 20736493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patient size and x-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. II. Image quality.
Huda W; Lieberman KA; Chang J; Roskopf ML
Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 15070259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Differentiation of urinary calculi with dual energy CT: effect of spectral shaping by high energy tin filtration.
Thomas C; Krauss B; Ketelsen D; Tsiflikas I; Reimann A; Werner M; Schilling D; Hennenlotter J; Claussen CD; Schlemmer HP; Heuschmid M
Invest Radiol; 2010 Jul; 45(7):393-8. PubMed ID: 20440214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High Atomic Number Contrast Media Offer Potential for Radiation Dose Reduction in Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography.
Roessler AC; Hupfer M; Kolditz D; Jost G; Pietsch H; Kalender WA
Invest Radiol; 2016 Apr; 51(4):249-54. PubMed ID: 26606552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Iodine contrast-to-noise ratio improvement at unit dose and contrast media volume reduction in whole-body photon-counting CT.
Sawall S; Klein L; Amato C; Wehrse E; Dorn S; Maier J; Heinze S; Schlemmer HP; Ziener CH; Uhrig M; Kachelrieß M
Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108909. PubMed ID: 32145600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comprehensive analysis of DgN(CT) coefficients for pendant-geometry cone-beam breast computed tomography.
Boone JM; Shah N; Nelson TR
Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):226-35. PubMed ID: 15000608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Photon counting spectral CT: improved material decomposition with K-edge-filtered x-rays.
Shikhaliev PM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 57(6):1595-615. PubMed ID: 22398007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spectral dependence of glandular tissue dose in screen-film mammography.
Wu X; Barnes GT; Tucker DM
Radiology; 1991 Apr; 179(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 2006265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Potential of dual-energy subtraction for converting CT numbers to electron density based on a single linear relationship.
Saito M
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2021-30. PubMed ID: 22482623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of double layer filter on mean glandular dose (MGD) and image quality in low energy image of contrast enhanced spectral mammography (LE-CESM).
Niroshani HS; Nakamura T; Michiru N; Negishi T
Radiography (Lond); 2022 May; 28(2):340-347. PubMed ID: 34838440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Optimal beam quality selection in digital mammography.
Young KC; Oduko JM; Bosmans H; Nijs K; Martinez L
Br J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 79(948):981-90. PubMed ID: 17213303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimal multidetector row CT parameters for evaluations of the breast: a phantom and specimen study.
Yi A; Seo BK; Cho PK; Pisano ED; Lee KY; Je BK; Kim HY; Min BW; Son GS
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):744-51. PubMed ID: 20457417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
