135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21361181)
41. Automated bone removal in CT angiography: comparison of methods based on single energy and dual energy scans.
van Straten M; Schaap M; Dijkshoorn ML; Greuter MJ; van der Lugt A; Krestin GP; Niessen WJ
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6128-37. PubMed ID: 22047377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Automatic selection of tube potential for radiation dose reduction in CT: a general strategy.
Yu L; Li H; Fletcher JG; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):234-43. PubMed ID: 20175486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Impact of exposure dose reduction of radiation treatment planning CT using low tube voltage technique].
Kouno T; Kuga N; Enzaki M; Yamashita Y; Kitazato Y; Shimotabira H; Jinnouchi T; Kusuhara K; Kawamura S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2015 Apr; 71(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 25892417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Dose optimization in cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason-Lee AJ; McMillan C; Cowen AR; Davies AG
Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091911. PubMed ID: 24007162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Technical note: Characterization, validation, and spectral optimization of a dedicated breast CT system for contrast-enhanced imaging.
Pautasso JJ; Michielsen K; Sechopoulos I
Med Phys; 2024 May; 51(5):3322-3333. PubMed ID: 38597897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Monochromatic mammography using scanning multilayer X-ray mirrors.
Windt DL
Rev Sci Instrum; 2018 Aug; 89(8):083702. PubMed ID: 30184654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Optimal setting of automatic exposure control based on image noise and contrast on iodine-enhanced CT.
Murazaki H; Funama Y; Sugaya Y; Miyazaki O; Tomiguchi S; Awai K
Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):478-84. PubMed ID: 22222026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Patient doses and projection angle in cone beam CT.
He W; Huda W; Magill D; Tavrides E; Yao H
Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2359-68. PubMed ID: 20527570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Very low-dose coronary artery calcium scanning with high-pitch spiral acquisition mode: comparison between 120-kV and 100-kV tube voltage protocols.
Marwan M; Mettin C; Pflederer T; Seltmann M; Schuhbäck A; Muschiol G; Ropers D; Daniel WG; Achenbach S
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23333186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Technical note: optimization for improved tube-loading efficiency in the dual-energy computed tomography coupled with balanced filter method.
Saito M
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4182-5. PubMed ID: 20879578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Performance of dual-energy CT with tin filter technology for the discrimination of renal cysts and enhancing masses.
Leschka S; Stolzmann P; Baumüller S; Scheffel H; Desbiolles L; Schmid B; Marincek B; Alkadhi H
Acad Radiol; 2010 Apr; 17(4):526-34. PubMed ID: 20207320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Influence of the X-ray beam quality on the dose increment in CT with iodinated contrast medium.
Amato E; Asero G; Leotta S; Auditore L; Salamone I; Mannino G; Privitera S; Gueli A
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016; 24(2):267-78. PubMed ID: 27002906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Optimal beam quality selection based on contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose in digital mammography.
Aminah M; Ng KH; Abdullah BJ; Jamal N
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Dec; 33(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 20938762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Photon counting x-ray imaging with K-edge filtered x-rays: A simulation study.
Atak H; Shikhaliev PM
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1385-400. PubMed ID: 26936723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reducing radiation dose to the female breast during CT coronary angiography: a simulation study comparing breast shielding, angular tube current modulation, reduced kV, and partial angle protocols using an unknown-location signal-detectability metric.
Rupcich F; Badal A; Popescu LM; Kyprianou I; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081921. PubMed ID: 23927335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Screen-film mammographic technique for breast cancer screening.
Stanton L; Day JL; Villafana T; Miller CH; Lightfoot DA
Radiology; 1987 May; 163(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 3562829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Technical Note: Phantom study to evaluate the dose and image quality effects of a computed tomography organ-based tube current modulation technique.
Gandhi D; Crotty DJ; Stevens GM; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6572-8. PubMed ID: 26520748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A database for estimating organ dose for coronary angiography and brain perfusion CT scans for arbitrary spectra and angular tube current modulation.
Rupcich F; Badal A; Kyprianou I; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5336-46. PubMed ID: 22957601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality.
Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
