136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21361181)
61. Low tube voltage dual source computed tomography to reduce contrast media doses in adult abdomen examinations: A phantom study.
Thor D; Brismar TB; Fischer MA
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5100-9. PubMed ID: 26328961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Statistical model based iterative reconstruction in clinical CT systems. Part III. Task-based kV/mAs optimization for radiation dose reduction.
Li K; Gomez-Cardona D; Hsieh J; Lubner MG; Pickhardt PJ; Chen GH
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5209-21. PubMed ID: 26328971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Radiation and contrast agent doses reductions by using 80-kV tube voltage in coronary computed tomographic angiography: a comparative study.
Cao JX; Wang YM; Lu JG; Zhang Y; Wang P; Yang C
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Feb; 83(2):309-14. PubMed ID: 24315475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Radiation dose reduction by using 100-kV tube voltage in cardiac 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study.
Feuchtner GM; Jodocy D; Klauser A; Haberfellner B; Aglan I; Spoeck A; Hiehs S; Soegner P; Jaschke W
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e51-6. PubMed ID: 19671491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. CT dose equilibration and energy absorption in polyethylene cylinders with diameters from 6 to 55 cm.
Li X; Zhang D; Liu B
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2882-91. PubMed ID: 26127041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Optimal photon energy comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and mammography: a case study.
Di Maria S; Baptista M; Felix M; Oliveira N; Matela N; Janeiro L; Vaz P; Orvalho L; Silva A
Phys Med; 2014 Jun; 30(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 24613514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Monte Carlo calculation of monoenergetic and polyenergetic DgN coefficients for mean glandular dose estimates in mammography using a homogeneous breast model.
Sarno A; Tucciariello RM; Mettivier G; di Franco F; Russo P
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jun; 64(12):125012. PubMed ID: 31141793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Clinical application of varian OBI CBCT system and dose reduction techniques in breast cancer patients setup.
Ueltzhöffer S; Zygmanski P; Hesser J; Högele W; Wong J; Bellon JR; Lyatskaya Y
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2985-98. PubMed ID: 20632611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Dual energy exposure control (DEEC) for computed tomography: algorithm and simulation study.
Stenner P; Kachelriess M
Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):5054-60. PubMed ID: 19070239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The effects of gantry tilt on breast dose and image noise in cardiac CT.
Hoppe ME; Gandhi D; Stevens GM; Foley WD; Schmidt TG
Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121905. PubMed ID: 24320516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. TU-E-217BCD-01: X-Ray Spectra for Breast CT.
Kontson K; Jennings R; Kyprianou I
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part24):3913-3914. PubMed ID: 28518689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Technical note: Evaluation of artificial 120-kilovolt computed tomography images for radiation therapy applications.
Tao S; Gong H; Michalak G; McCollough C; Leng S; Hu Y
Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 49(6):3683-3691. PubMed ID: 35394074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Optimal beam quality for chest digital radiography].
Oda N; Tabata Y; Nakano T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Nov; 70(11):1265-72. PubMed ID: 25410333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Spectrum optimization for computed radiography mammography systems.
Figl M; Homolka P; Semturs F; Kaar M; Hummel J
Phys Med; 2016 Aug; 32(8):1034-9. PubMed ID: 27496197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Dedicated breast computed tomography: Basic aspects.
Sarno A; Mettivier G; Russo P
Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 42(6):2786-804. PubMed ID: 26127031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparison of central, peripheral, and weighted size-specific dose in CT.
Anam C; Adhianto D; Sutanto H; Adi K; Ali MH; Rae WID; Fujibuchi T; Dougherty G
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(4):695-708. PubMed ID: 32773401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Scaling-law for the energy dependence of anatomic power spectrum in dedicated breast CT.
Vedantham S; Shi L; Glick SJ; Karellas A
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011901. PubMed ID: 23298092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. SU-E-I-61: Phantom Design for Phase Contrast Breast Imaging.
Vedantham S; Karellas A
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part5):3638-3639. PubMed ID: 28517657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
