These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21361188)

  • 1. Sensitivity analysis of a geometric calibration method using projection matrices for digital tomosynthesis systems.
    Li X; Da Z; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):202-9. PubMed ID: 21361188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A generic geometric calibration method for tomographic imaging systems with flat-panel detectors--a detailed implementation guide.
    Li X; Da Z; Liu B
    Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3844-54. PubMed ID: 20831092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dependence of image quality on geometric factors in breast tomosynthesis.
    Mainprize JG; Bloomquist A; Wang X; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2011 Jun; 38(6):3090-103. PubMed ID: 21815382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accurate technique for complete geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography systems.
    Cho Y; Moseley DJ; Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):968-83. PubMed ID: 15895580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A phantom-based calibration method for digital x-ray tomosynthesis.
    Miao H; Wu X; Zhao H; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2012; 20(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 22398585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A geometric calibration method for the digital chest tomosynthesis with dual-axis scanning geometry.
    Chang CH; Ni YC; Huang SY; Hsieh HH; Tseng SP; Tseng FP
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0216054. PubMed ID: 31022255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auto calibration of a cone-beam-CT.
    Gross D; Heil U; Schulze R; Schoemer E; Schwanecke U
    Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5959-70. PubMed ID: 23039634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fast, accurate, and robust automatic marker detection for motion correction based on oblique kV or MV projection image pairs.
    Slagmolen P; Hermans J; Maes F; Budiharto T; Haustermans K; van den Heuvel F
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1554-64. PubMed ID: 20443476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Geometry calibration between X-ray source and detector for tomosynthesis with a portable X-ray system.
    Sato K; Ohnishi T; Sekine M; Haneishi H
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 May; 12(5):707-717. PubMed ID: 28343304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
    Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of a constrained paired-view technique in iterative reconstruction for breast tomosynthesis.
    Wu G; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101901. PubMed ID: 24089903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for C-arm mammography tomosynthesis.
    Rakowski JT; Dennis MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3018-32. PubMed ID: 16964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Line-based iterative geometric calibration method for a tomosynthesis system.
    Choi CJ; Vent TL; Acciavatti RJ; Maidment ADA
    Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2444-2460. PubMed ID: 38394613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast tomosynthesis using the multiple projection algorithm adapted for stationary detectors.
    Malliori A; Bliznakova K; Bliznakov Z; Cockmartin L; Bosmans H; Pallikarakis N
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2016; 24(1):23-41. PubMed ID: 26890907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Online geometric calibration of cone-beam computed tomography for arbitrary imaging objects.
    Meng Y; Gong H; Yang X
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Feb; 32(2):278-88. PubMed ID: 23076032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automatic marker detection and 3D position reconstruction using cine EPID images for SBRT verification.
    Park SJ; Ionascu D; Hacker F; Mamon H; Berbeco R
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4536-46. PubMed ID: 19928085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Breast tomosynthesis: Dosimetry and image quality assessment on phantom.
    Meyblum E; Gardavaud F; Dao TH; Fournier V; Beaussart P; Pigneur F; Baranes L; Rahmouni A; Luciani A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2015 Sep; 96(9):931-9. PubMed ID: 25908324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital tomosynthesis of hand joints for arthritis assessment.
    Duryea J; Dobbins JT; Lynch JA
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 12674232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental phantom lesion detectability study using a digital breast tomosynthesis prototype system.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Lell M; Böhner C; Bautz WA; Mertelmeier T
    Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1219-23. PubMed ID: 17136645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.