260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21361212)
1. A TCP model incorporating setup uncertainty and tumor cell density variation in microscopic extension to guide treatment planning.
Jin JY; Kong FM; Liu D; Ren L; Li H; Zhong H; Movsas B; Chetty IJ
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):439-48. PubMed ID: 21361212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Loss of local control due to tumor displacement as a function of margin size, dose-response slope, and number of fractions.
Selvaraj J; Uzan J; Baker C; Nahum A
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041715. PubMed ID: 23556885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of patient setup errors on simultaneously integrated boost head and neck IMRT treatment plans.
Siebers JV; Keall PJ; Wu Q; Williamson JF; Schmidt-Ullrich RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):422-33. PubMed ID: 16168835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fitting tumor control probability models to biopsy outcome after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer: pitfalls in deducing radiobiologic parameters for tumors from clinical data.
Levegrün S; Jackson A; Zelefsky MJ; Skwarchuk MW; Venkatraman ES; Schlegel W; Fuks Z; Leibel SA; Ling CC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Nov; 51(4):1064-80. PubMed ID: 11704332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons of treatment optimization directly incorporating random patient setup uncertainty with a margin-based approach.
Moore JA; Gordon JJ; Anscher MS; Siebers JV
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3880-90. PubMed ID: 19810460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the influence of setup uncertainties on treatment planning for focal liver tumors.
Balter JM; Brock KK; Lam KL; Tatro D; Dawson LA; McShan DL; Ten Haken RK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):610-4. PubMed ID: 16095848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combined recipe for clinical target volume and planning target volume margins.
Stroom J; Gilhuijs K; Vieira S; Chen W; Salguero J; Moser E; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Mar; 88(3):708-14. PubMed ID: 24113058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of setup and range uncertainties on TCP and NTCP following VMAT or IMPT of oropharyngeal cancer patients.
Hamming-Vrieze O; Depauw N; Craft DL; Chan AW; Rasch CRN; Verheij M; Sonke JJ; Kooy HM
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Apr; 64(9):095001. PubMed ID: 30921775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric effect of respiratory motion in external beam radiotherapy of the lung.
Mechalakos J; Yorke E; Mageras GS; Hertanto A; Jackson A; Obcemea C; Rosenzweig K; Clifton Ling C
Radiother Oncol; 2004 May; 71(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 15110453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tumor control probability and the utility of 4D vs 3D dose calculations for stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer.
Valdes G; Robinson C; Lee P; Morel D; Low D; Iwamoto KS; Lamb JM
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 25542785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiobiological evaluation considering setup error on single-isocenter irradiation in stereotactic radiosurgery.
Nakano H; Tanabe S; Sasamoto R; Takizawa T; Utsunomiya S; Sakai M; Nakano T; Ohta A; Kaidu M; Ishikawa H
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jul; 22(7):266-275. PubMed ID: 34151498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On cold spots in tumor subvolumes.
Tomé WA; Fowler JF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1590-8. PubMed ID: 12148742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT.
Astreinidou E; Bel A; Raaijmakers CP; Terhaard CH; Lagendijk JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(3):938-44. PubMed ID: 15708278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of microscopic disease on the tumor control probability in non-small-cell lung cancer.
Siedschlag C; Boersma L; van Loon J; Rossi M; van Baardwijk A; Gilhuijs K; Stroom J
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Sep; 100(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 21955665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A conceptual model integrating spatial information to assess target volume coverage for IMRT treatment planning.
Chao KS; Blanco AI; Dempsey JF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Aug; 56(5):1438-49. PubMed ID: 12873690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modeling tumor control probability for spatially inhomogeneous risk of failure based on clinical outcome data.
Lühr A; Löck S; Jakobi A; Stützer K; Bandurska-Luque A; Vogelius IR; Enghardt W; Baumann M; Krause M
Z Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 27(4):285-299. PubMed ID: 28676371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A theoretical investigation of adequate range uncertainty margins in proton treatment planning to preserve tumor control probability.
Taasti VT; Jeong J; Jackson A; Deasy JO
Acta Oncol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):1446-1450. PubMed ID: 31241385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of Gaussian uncertainty assumptions on probabilistic optimization in particle therapy.
Wieser HP; Karger CP; Wahl N; Bangert M
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 65(14):145007. PubMed ID: 32340012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate cancer tumour control probability modelling for external beam radiotherapy based on multi-parametric MRI-GTV definition.
Sachpazidis I; Mavroidis P; Zamboglou C; Klein CM; Grosu AL; Baltas D
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Oct; 15(1):242. PubMed ID: 33081804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
