181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21361440)
1. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in humans.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Kopun J; Tan H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):817-27. PubMed ID: 21361440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Growth of suppression in humans based on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Kopun J; Tan H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):801-6. PubMed ID: 21361439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low-frequency and high-frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression in humans.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dierking DM; Kopun J; Jolkowski K; Groenenboom K; Tan H; Stiegemann B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Apr; 123(4):2172-90. PubMed ID: 18397024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distortion-product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in hearing-impaired humans.
Gruhlke A; Birkholz C; Neely ST; Kopun J; Tan H; Jesteadt W; Schmid K; Gorga MP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):3292-304. PubMed ID: 23145613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears.
Gorga MP; Neely ST; Dierking DM; Dorn PA; Hoover BM; Fitzpatrick DF
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jul; 114(1):263-78. PubMed ID: 12880040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of reversible noise exposure on the suppression tuning of rabbit distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Howard MA; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL; Martin GK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jan; 111(1 Pt 1):285-96. PubMed ID: 11831802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves in human adults and neonates.
Abdala C; Sininger YS; Ekelid M; Zeng FG
Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):38-53. PubMed ID: 8880180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: results from cochlear mechanics simulation.
Liu YW; Neely ST
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):951-61. PubMed ID: 23363112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal aspects of suppression in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Rodriguez J; Neely ST
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3082-9. PubMed ID: 21568411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Behaviors of cubic distortion product otoacoustic emissions evoked by amplitude modulated tones.
Bian L; Chen S
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):828-39. PubMed ID: 21361441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f(2). II. Findings in humans.
Martin GK; Villasuso EI; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
Hear Res; 2003 Mar; 177(1-2):111-22. PubMed ID: 12618323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Changes in the Compressive Nonlinearity of the Cochlea During Early Aging: Estimates From Distortion OAE Input/Output Functions.
Ortmann AJ; Abdala C
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):603-14. PubMed ID: 27232070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Level dependence of the nonlinear-distortion component of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
Zelle D; Thiericke JP; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3475-90. PubMed ID: 26723305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
Johnson TA; Baranowski LG
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Otoacoustic emission estimates of human basilar membrane impulse response duration and cochlear filter tuning.
Raufer S; Verhulst S
Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 342():150-160. PubMed ID: 27989947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners.
Charaziak KK; Souza PE; Siegel JH
Int J Audiol; 2015 Feb; 54(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 25290042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of loop diuretics on the suppression tuning of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in rabbits.
Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Lonsbury-Martin BL
J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):972-83. PubMed ID: 9714917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: II. threshold prediction.
Rogers AR; Burke SR; Kopun JG; Tan H; Neely ST; Gorga MP
Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):546-54. PubMed ID: 20458245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression functions obtained with ramped stimuli.
Purcell DW; Butler BE; Saunders TJ; Allen P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2133-48. PubMed ID: 19062854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cochlear nonlinearity in normal-hearing subjects as inferred psychophysically and from distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
Johannesen PT; Lopez-Poveda EA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2149-63. PubMed ID: 19062855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
