These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21361440)

  • 21. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Dalhoff E; Turcanu D; Vetešník A; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold.
    Pienkowski M; Kunov H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1496-502. PubMed ID: 11325121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Maturation of the human cochlear amplifier: distortion product otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves recorded at low and high primary tone levels.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1465-76. PubMed ID: 11572357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hearing threshold estimation using concurrent measurement of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and auditory steady-state responses.
    Rosner T; Kandzia F; Oswald JA; Janssen T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):840-51. PubMed ID: 21361442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on cochlear tuning measured using stimulus frequency and distortion product OAEs.
    Boothalingam S; Lineton B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Dec; 51(12):892-9. PubMed ID: 22934932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Extraction of sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by onset-decomposition.
    Vetesník A; Turcanu D; Dalhoff E; Gummer AW
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):21-38. PubMed ID: 19523509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans.
    Kummer P; Janssen T; Arnold W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul; 98(1):197-210. PubMed ID: 7608400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multi-tone suppression of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Sieck NE; Rasetshwane DM; Kopun JG; Jesteadt W; Gorga MP; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2299. PubMed ID: 27250125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Locus of generation for the 2f1-f2 vs 2f2-f1 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing humans revealed by suppression tuning, onset latencies, and amplitude correlations.
    Martin GK; Jassir D; Stagner BB; Whitehead ML; Lonsbury-Martin BL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):1957-71. PubMed ID: 9566319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonates.
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Dec; 100(6):3726-40. PubMed ID: 8969474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions.
    Keefe DH; Ellison JC; Fitzpatrick DF; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Mar; 123(3):1479-94. PubMed ID: 18345837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. DPOAE suppression tuning: cochlear immaturity in premature neonates or auditory aging in normal-hearing adults?
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Dec; 110(6):3155-62. PubMed ID: 11785816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of distortion-product otoacoustic emission and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission two-tone suppression in humans.
    Rasetshwane DM; Bosen EC; Kopun JG; Neely ST
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Dec; 146(6):4481. PubMed ID: 31893726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning.
    Charaziak KK; Souza P; Siegel JH
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Dec; 14(6):843-62. PubMed ID: 24013802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Frequency responses of two- and three-tone distortion product otoacoustic emissions in Mongolian gerbils.
    Mills DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 May; 107(5 Pt 1):2586-602. PubMed ID: 10830382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, hair cell loss, and forward masked tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pig.
    Canlon B; Marklund K; Borg E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3232-43. PubMed ID: 8300958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: effect of the primary frequency in Dpgrams.
    Zhang F; Boettcher FA; Sun XM
    Int J Audiol; 2007 Apr; 46(4):187-95. PubMed ID: 17454232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age-related shifts in distortion product otoacoustic emissions peak-ratios and amplitude modulation spectra.
    Lai J; Bartlett EL
    Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():186-98. PubMed ID: 26232530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2f1-f2) suppression in 3-month-old infants: evidence for postnatal maturation of human cochlear function?
    Abdala C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Dec; 116(6):3572-80. PubMed ID: 15658708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: its dependence on age and hearing threshold and clinical implications.
    Wagner W; Plinkert PK; Vonthein R; Plontke SK
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Oct; 265(10):1165-72. PubMed ID: 18301908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.