These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21361456)

  • 21. Modifying speech to children based on their perceived phonetic accuracy.
    Julien HM; Munson B
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1836-49. PubMed ID: 22744140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception and production of voiceless Spanish fricatives by Chicano children and adults.
    Greenlee M
    Lang Speech; 1992; 35 ( Pt 1-2)():173-87. PubMed ID: 1287387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spectral dynamics of sibilant fricatives are contrastive and language specific.
    Reidy PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Oct; 140(4):2518. PubMed ID: 27794290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: patterns of variation in fricative production.
    Silbert N; de Jong K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2769-79. PubMed ID: 18529193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Cross-Sectional Age Group Study of Coarticulatory Resistance: The Case of Late-Acquired Voiceless Fricatives in English.
    Howson PJ; Redford MA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Sep; 65(9):3316-3336. PubMed ID: 35998285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sex-related acoustic changes in voiceless English fricatives.
    Fox RA; Nissen SL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Aug; 48(4):753-65. PubMed ID: 16378471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Unified Coding of Spectral and Temporal Phonetic Cues: Electrophysiological Evidence for Abstract Phonological Features.
    Monahan PJ; Schertz J; Fu Z; Pérez A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2022 Mar; 34(4):618-638. PubMed ID: 35061026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The influence of language on the acoustic properties of phonetic features: a study of the feature [strident] in Ewe and English.
    Utman JA; Blumstein SE
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(4):221-38. PubMed ID: 7938204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Formant transitions in fricative identification: the role of native fricative inventory.
    Wagner A; Ernestus M; Cutler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2267-77. PubMed ID: 17069322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of language experience on pre-categorical perception: Distinguishing general from specialized processes in speech perception.
    Iverson P; Wagner A; Rosen S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1799. PubMed ID: 27106328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cross-language similarities and differences in the uptake of place information.
    Wagner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4256-67. PubMed ID: 23742376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relationships Between Acoustic Characteristics and Intelligibility Scores: A Reanalysis of Japanese Speakers' Productions of American English Liquids.
    Aoyama K; Hong L; Flege JE; Akahane-Yamada R; Yamada T
    Lang Speech; 2023 Dec; 66(4):1030-1045. PubMed ID: 36680472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sibilant Fricative Merging in Taiwan Mandarin: An Investigation of Tongue Postures using Ultrasound Imaging.
    Chiu C; Wei PC; Noguchi M; Yamane N
    Lang Speech; 2020 Dec; 63(4):877-897. PubMed ID: 31888408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bilingual phonological contrast perception: The influence of Quanzhou Southern Min on Mandarin non-sibilant fricative discrimination.
    Weng C; Chitoran I; Martin A
    JASA Express Lett; 2023 Jul; 3(7):. PubMed ID: 37477583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Language-specific developmental differences in speech production: a cross-language acoustic study.
    Li F
    Child Dev; 2012; 83(4):1303-15. PubMed ID: 22540834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acoustic analysis of the voiced-voiceless distinction in Dutch tracheoesophageal speech.
    Jongmans P; Wempe TG; van Tinteren H; Hilgers FJ; Pols LC; van As-Brooks CJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Apr; 53(2):284-97. PubMed ID: 20360458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acoustic characteristics of fricatives, amplitude of formants and clarity of speech produced without and with a medical mask.
    Nguyen DD; Chacon A; Payten C; Black R; Sheth M; McCabe P; Novakovic D; Madill C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2022 Mar; 57(2):366-380. PubMed ID: 35166414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Focusing the lens of language experience: perception of Ma'di stops by Greek and English bilinguals and monolinguals.
    Antoniou M; Best CT; Tyler MD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2397-411. PubMed ID: 23556605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of speaker variability and noise on Mandarin fricative identification by native and non-native listeners.
    Lee CY; Zhang Y; Li X; Tao L; Bond ZS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 22894232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fricative acquisition in English- and Icelandic-speaking preschoolers with protracted phonological development.
    Bernhardt BM; Másdóttir T; Stemberger JP; Leonhardt L; Hansson GÓ
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2015; 29(8-10):642-65. PubMed ID: 25985229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.