These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21361618)

  • 1. A simulator for oscillometric blood-pressure signals to test automated noninvasive sphygmomanometers.
    Riedel W; Mieke S; Seemann R; Ittermann B
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2011 Feb; 82(2):024303. PubMed ID: 21361618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extracting oscillometric pulses from the cuff pressure: does it affect the pressures determined by oscillometric blood pressure monitors?
    Amoore JN
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 16932036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
    Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
    Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The reliability of the measurement of non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure instruments].
    Mieke S; Gross H; Ulbrich M; Papadopoulos G; Frucht U
    Anaesthesist; 1993 Jan; 42(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 8447571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blood pressure in children aged 4-8 years: comparison of Omron HEM 711 and sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements.
    Midgley PC; Wardhaugh B; Macfarlane C; Magowan R; Kelnar CJ
    Arch Dis Child; 2009 Dec; 94(12):955-8. PubMed ID: 19608553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Home blood pressure measurement with oscillometric upper-arm devices.
    Braam RL; Thien T
    Neth J Med; 2003 Oct; 61(10):307-12. PubMed ID: 14708907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oscillometric blood pressure devices and simulators: measurements of repeatability and differences between models.
    Sims AJ; Reay CA; Bousfield DR; Menes JA; Murray A
    J Med Eng Technol; 2005; 29(3):112-8. PubMed ID: 16019880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
    Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
    Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can a simulator that regenerates physiological waveforms evaluate oscillometric non-invasive blood pressure devices?
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 16534407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement: description of the method used.
    Wonka F
    Z Kardiol; 1996; 85 Suppl 3():1-7. PubMed ID: 8896292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Algorithms for converting random-zero to automated oscillometric blood pressure values, and vice versa.
    Stang A; Moebus S; Möhlenkamp S; Dragano N; Schmermund A; Beck EM; Siegrist J; Erbel R; Jöckel KH;
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Jul; 164(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 16675536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical evaluation of a simulator for accurate reproduction of oscillometric blood pressure pulses, providing traceability for automated oscillometric sphygmomanometers.
    Mieke S; Murray A
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Sep; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 37657422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Korotkoff sound versus oscillometric cuff sphygmomanometers: comparison between auscultatory and DynaPulse blood pressure measurements.
    Chio SS; Urbina EM; Lapointe J; Tsai J; Berenson GS
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2011; 5(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 21269907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the performance of automated sphygmomanometers using a patient simulator.
    Rodrigues Filho BA; Farias RF; Anjos WED; Monteiro EC
    Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):299-305. PubMed ID: 31425156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical decision-making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRU) measurement device.
    Graves JW; Nash C; Burger K; Bailey K; Sheps SG
    J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):823-7. PubMed ID: 14704726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oscillometric wrist blood pressure measuring devices.
    Braam RL; Asian B; Thien T
    Neth J Med; 2003 Oct; 61(10):313-7. PubMed ID: 14708908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study.
    Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D
    Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.