100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21361884)
1. The effects of cochlear implantation on speech perception in older adults.
Budenz CL; Cosetti MK; Coelho DH; Birenbaum B; Babb J; Waltzman SB; Roehm PC
J Am Geriatr Soc; 2011 Mar; 59(3):446-53. PubMed ID: 21361884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of older adult cochlear implant users in Hong Kong.
Chan V; Tong M; Yue V; Wong T; Leung E; Yuen K; van Hasselt A
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):52S-55S. PubMed ID: 17496647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Case-control analysis of cochlear implant performance in elderly patients.
Friedland DR; Runge-Samuelson C; Baig H; Jensen J
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2010 May; 136(5):432-8. PubMed ID: 20479370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is there a right cochlear implant advantage?
Henkin Y; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Hildesheimer M; Migirov L; Kronenberg J; Kishon-Rabin L
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jun; 29(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 18401283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cochlear implantation in elderly patients: surgical and audiological outcome.
Migirov L; Taitelbaum-Swead R; Drendel M; Hildesheimer M; Kronenberg J
Gerontology; 2010; 56(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 19713692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cochlear implantation in the octogenarian and nonagenarian.
Carlson ML; Breen JT; Gifford RH; Driscoll CL; Neff BA; Beatty CW; Peterson AM; Olund AP
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Oct; 31(8):1343-9. PubMed ID: 20729782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech perception in elderly patients following cochlear implantation.
Haensel J; Ilgner J; Chen YS; Thuermer C; Westhofen M
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 125(12):1272-6. PubMed ID: 16303673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cochlear implants in elderly people: preliminary results.
Sterkers O; Mosnier I; Ambert-Dahan E; Herelle-Dupuy E; Bozorg-Grayeli A; Bouccara D
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2004 May; (552):64-7. PubMed ID: 15219050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception of children using Nucleus, Clarion or Med-El cochlear implants.
Taitelbaum-Swead R; Kishon-Rabin L; Kaplan-Neeman R; Muchnik C; Kronenberg J; Hildesheimer M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1675-83. PubMed ID: 15955572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech perception with the ACE and the SPEAK speech coding strategies for children implanted with the Nucleus cochlear implant.
Manrique M; Huarte A; Morera C; Caballé L; Ramos A; Castillo C; García-Ibáñez L; Estrada E; Juan E
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 69(12):1667-74. PubMed ID: 16168497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision cochlear implant surgery in children: the Johns Hopkins experience.
Marlowe AL; Chinnici JE; Rivas A; Niparko JK; Francis HW
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jan; 31(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 19887981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of the growth of open-set speech perception between the nucleus 22 and nucleus 24 cochlear implant systems.
Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Roland JT
Am J Otol; 1999 Jul; 20(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 10431883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of newborn hearing screening: comparing outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant users.
Philips B; Corthals P; De Raeve L; D'haenens W; Maes L; Bockstael A; Keppler H; Swinnen F; De Vel E; Vinck B; Dhooge I
Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):974-9. PubMed ID: 19358207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cochlear implant performance in senior citizens.
Labadie RF; Carrasco VN; Gilmer CH; Pillsbury HC
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Oct; 123(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 11020178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of central nervous system residua on cochlear implant results in children deafened by meningitis.
Francis HW; Pulsifer MB; Chinnici J; Nutt R; Venick HS; Yeagle JD; Niparko JK
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 May; 130(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 15148184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of the promontory stimulation test in predicting speech perception after cochlear implantation.
Lee JC; Yoo MH; Ahn JH; Lee KS
Laryngoscope; 2007 Nov; 117(11):1988-92. PubMed ID: 17767084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
