These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21362664)

  • 1. Interpreting the p value.
    Maldonado F; West CP
    Chest; 2011 Mar; 139(3):723-724. PubMed ID: 21362664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayes' theorem: a paradigm research tool in biomedical sciences.
    Okeh UM; Ugwu AC
    East Afr J Public Health; 2009 Apr; 6 Suppl(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 20088070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Youden's index and the weight of evidence.
    Hughes G
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(2):198-9. PubMed ID: 25658987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rule of 100: a litmus test for informationless diagnostic tests.
    Westover AM; Shapiro D; Westover MB; Bianchi MT
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Jun; 94(1112):364-366. PubMed ID: 29514996
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Bayes' rule in diagnostic testing: a graphical explanation.
    Johnson KM
    Diagnosis (Berl); 2017 Sep; 4(3):159-167. PubMed ID: 29536931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Issues in the application of Bayes' Theorem to child abuse decision making.
    Proeve M
    Child Maltreat; 2009 Feb; 14(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 18495947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. We only see what we already know--a modified Bayes' formula to explain inherent limitations of diagnostic tests.
    Sonnenberg A
    Med Hypotheses; 2004; 63(4):759-63. PubMed ID: 15325029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
    Fosgate GT
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1287-8; author reply 1288. PubMed ID: 15765500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cautionary tales in the clinical interpretation of studies of diagnostic tests.
    Scott IA; Greenberg PB; Poole PJ
    Intern Med J; 2008 Feb; 38(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 17645501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Imputation approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy for multiple tests from partially verified designs.
    Albert PS
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):947-57. PubMed ID: 17825024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why clinicians are natural bayesians.
    Gill CJ; Sabin L; Schmid CH
    BMJ; 2005 May; 330(7499):1080-3. PubMed ID: 15879401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modeling conditional dependence between diagnostic tests: a multiple latent variable model.
    Dendukuri N; Hadgu A; Wang L
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):441-61. PubMed ID: 19067379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian estimation of intervention effect with pre- and post-misclassified binomial data.
    Stamey JD; Seaman JW; Young DM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(1):93-108. PubMed ID: 17219757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Laboratory errors – why the laboratory is not (always) to blame].
    Savoca R
    Ther Umsch; 2015 Feb; 72(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 25630293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information graphs for epidemiological applications of the Kullback-Leibler divergence.
    Hughes G
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):IV-VI. PubMed ID: 24407730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical Bayes combination of estimated areas under ROC curves using estimating equations.
    Zhou XH
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 8717595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice.
    Akobeng AK
    Acta Paediatr; 2007 Apr; 96(4):487-91. PubMed ID: 17306009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian versus frequentist methods for estimating true prevalence of disease and diagnostic test performance.
    Sanogo M; Abatih E; Saegerman C
    Vet J; 2014 Nov; 202(2):204-7. PubMed ID: 25172837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Inappropriate use of diagnostic laboratory tests--a perspective from decision making analysis].
    Ulvestad E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Aug; 120(19):2294-8. PubMed ID: 10997091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research and statistics: demystifying type I and type II errors.
    Jennings JM; Sibinga E
    Pediatr Rev; 2010 May; 31(5):209-10. PubMed ID: 20435712
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.