148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21364081)
1. ACRIN CT colonography trial: does reader's preference for primary two-dimensional versus primary three-dimensional interpretation affect performance?
Hara AK; Blevins M; Chen MH; Dachman AH; Kuo MD; Menias CO; Siewert B; Cheema JI; Obregon RG; Fidler JL; Zimmerman P; Horton KM; Coakley KJ; Iyer RB; Halvorsen RA; Casola G; Yee J; Herman BA; Johnson CD
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):435-41. PubMed ID: 21364081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two- versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography.
Kim SH; Lee JM; Eun HW; Lee MW; Han JK; Lee JY; Choi BI
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):852-64. PubMed ID: 17709833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of a standardized CT colonography training program for novice readers.
Liedenbaum MH; Bipat S; Bossuyt PM; Dwarkasing RS; de Haan MC; Jansen RJ; Kauffman D; van der Leij C; de Lijster MS; Lute CC; van der Paardt MP; Thomeer MG; Zijlstra IA; Stoker J
Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):477-87. PubMed ID: 21177395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings.
Baker ME; Bogoni L; Obuchowski NA; Dass C; Kendzierski RM; Remer EM; Einstein DM; Cathier P; Jerebko A; Lakare S; Blum A; Caroline DF; Macari M
Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 17885187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial.
Regge D; Della Monica P; Galatola G; Laudi C; Zambon A; Correale L; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Borghi C; Campanella D; Cassinis MC; Ferrari R; Ferraris A; Hassan C; Golfieri R; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Laghi A; Massara R; Neri E; Sali L; Venturini S; Gandini G
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 23151831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Computer-aided detection (CAD) using 360 degree virtual dissection: can CAD in a first reviewer paradigm be a reliable substitute for primary 2D or 3D search?
Johnson KT; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W172-6. PubMed ID: 17885028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults.
Johnson CD; Fletcher JG; MacCarty RL; Mandrekar JN; Harmsen WS; Limburg PJ; Wilson LA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):672-80. PubMed ID: 17715116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial.
Dachman AH; Obuchowski NA; Hoffmeister JW; Hinshaw JL; Frew MI; Winter TC; Van Uitert RL; Periaswamy S; Summers RM; Hillman BJ
Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):827-35. PubMed ID: 20663975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of two 3D MDCT colonography protocols for observation of colorectal polyps.
Yasumoto T; Murakami T; Yamamoto H; Hori M; Iannaccone R; Kim T; Abe H; Kuwabara M; Yamasaki K; Kikkawa N; Arimoto H; Passariello R; Nakamura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 16357383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies.
Iannaccone R; Catalano C; Mangiapane F; Murakami T; Lamazza A; Fiori E; Schillaci A; Marin D; Nofroni I; Hori M; Passariello R
Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):927-37. PubMed ID: 16304113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CT colonography: preliminary assessment of a double-read paradigm that uses computer-aided detection as the first reader.
Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Segnan N; Laghi A; Iafrate F; Campanella D; Neri E; Cerri F; Hassan C; Regge D
Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):743-51. PubMed ID: 23630310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; McFarland EG; Taylor AJ
Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):872-8. PubMed ID: 16118167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of CT colonography for the detection of colorectal polyps.
Yun JY; Ro HJ; Park JB; Choi JB; Chung JE; Kim YJ; Suh WH; Lee JK
Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 18071278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography.
Yoshida H; Dachman AH
Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2004 Oct; 25(5):419-31. PubMed ID: 15559125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variation in diagnostic performance among radiologists at screening CT colonography.
Pooler BD; Kim DH; Hassan C; Rinaldi A; Burnside ES; Pickhardt PJ
Radiology; 2013 Jul; 268(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 23449954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
