These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21364101)

  • 1. Effects of collaborative group composition and inquiry instruction on reasoning gains and achievement in undergraduate biology.
    Jensen JL; Lawson A
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 21364101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation of the peer-led team-learning instructional model as a stopgap measure improves student achievement for students opting out of laboratory.
    Snyder JJ; Carter BE; Wiles JR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015 Mar; 14(1):ar2. PubMed ID: 25673354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of discovery learning in a lower-division biology course.
    Wilke RR; Straits WJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2001 Dec; 25(1-4):134-41. PubMed ID: 11824190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Student use of out-of-class study groups in an introductory undergraduate biology course.
    Rybczynski SM; Schussler EE
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2011; 10(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 21364102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Student perspectives on curricular change: lessons from an undergraduate lower-division biology core.
    Casem ML
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2006; 5(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 17012192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Teacher- versus peer-mediated instruction: an ecobehavioral analysis of achievement outcomes.
    Greenwood CR; Dinwiddie G; Terry B; Wade L; Stanley SO; Thibadeau S; Delquadri JC
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1984; 17(4):521-38. PubMed ID: 6526770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology.
    Haak DC; HilleRisLambers J; Pitre E; Freeman S
    Science; 2011 Jun; 332(6034):1213-6. PubMed ID: 21636776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deaf, Hard-of-Hearing, and Hearing Signing Undergraduates' Attitudes toward Science in Inquiry-Based Biology Laboratory Classes.
    Gormally C
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(1):. PubMed ID: 28188279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open problem-based instruction impacts understanding of physiological concepts differently in undergraduate students.
    Franklin BM; Xiang L; Collett JA; Rhoads MK; Osborn JL
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Dec; 39(4):327-34. PubMed ID: 26628656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of an active learning approach in a SCALE-UP learning space improves academic performance in undergraduate General Biology.
    Hacisalihoglu G; Stephens D; Johnson L; Edington M
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197916. PubMed ID: 29795683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: positive relationships with long-term student achievement.
    Derting TL; Ebert-May D
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2010; 9(4):462-72. PubMed ID: 21123693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Student Learning Outcomes and Attitudes Using Three Methods of Group Formation in a Nonmajors Biology Class.
    Donovan DA; Connell GL; Grunspan DZ
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2018 Dec; 17(4):ar60. PubMed ID: 30444447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Collaborative learning in pre-clinical dental hygiene education.
    Mueller-Joseph LJ; Nappo-Dattoma L
    J Dent Hyg; 2013 Apr; 87(2):64-72. PubMed ID: 23986139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Supplemental instruction in introductory biology I: enhancing the performance and retention of underrepresented minority students.
    Rath KA; Peterfreund AR; Xenos SP; Bayliss F; Carnal N
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 17785403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigating the Role of an Inquiry-Based Biology Lab Course on Student Attitudes and Views toward Science.
    Jeffery E; Nomme K; Deane T; Pollock C; Birol G
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27856549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding the Complex Relationship between Critical Thinking and Science Reasoning among Undergraduate Thesis Writers.
    Dowd JE; Thompson RJ; Schiff LA; Reynolds JA
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2018; 17(1):. PubMed ID: 29326103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Small changes, big gains: A curriculum-wide study of teaching practices and student learning in undergraduate biology.
    Weir LK; Barker MK; McDonnell LM; Schimpf NG; Rodela TM; Schulte PM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220900. PubMed ID: 31461447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fostering 21st-Century Evolutionary Reasoning: Teaching Tree Thinking to Introductory Biology Students.
    Novick LR; Catley KM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27881445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Teaching cell biology in the large-enrollment classroom: methods to promote analytical thinking and assessment of their effectiveness.
    Kitchen E; Bell JD; Reeve S; Sudweeks RR; Bradshaw WS
    Cell Biol Educ; 2003; 2(3):180-94. PubMed ID: 14506506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Professional science education videos improve student performance in nonmajor and intermediate biology laboratory courses.
    Mutch-Jones K; Sengupta N; Minor VC; Goudsouzian LK
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2021 Jan; 49(1):151-159. PubMed ID: 32786139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.