These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Personalized assessment of radiation risks from the one-stop-shop myocardial 256-slice CT examination. Perisinakis K; Seimenis I; Tzedakis A; Pagonidis K; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J Int J Cardiol; 2013 Oct; 168(6):5267-72. PubMed ID: 23988304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Imaging tests can lead to harmful radiation exposure. Tests designed to diagnose heart problems may increase your cancer risk. Heart Advis; 2010 Jun; 13(6):6. PubMed ID: 23166972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Resurrection of thallium-201 for myocardial perfusion imaging. Strauss HW; Bailey D JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Mar; 2(3):283-5. PubMed ID: 19356572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk of patients with ischemic heart diseases from diagnostic and therapeutic imaging procedures. Brix G; Berton M; Nekolla E; Lechel U; Schegerer A; Süselbeck T; Fink C Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1926-32. PubMed ID: 23954016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Constipation and metaiodobenzylguanidine myocardial scintigraphy abnormality. Tateno F; Sakakibara R; Kishi M; Ogawa E; Takada N; Hosoe N; Suzuki Y; Takahashi M; Uchiyama T; Yamamoto T J Am Geriatr Soc; 2012 Jan; 60(1):185-7. PubMed ID: 22239316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction in occupational and patient radiation exposure from myocardial perfusion imaging: impact of stress-only imaging and high-efficiency SPECT camera technology. Duvall WL; Guma KA; Kamen J; Croft LB; Parides M; George T; Henzlova MJ J Nucl Med; 2013 Aug; 54(8):1251-7. PubMed ID: 23723432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can intrauterine devices actually be considered safe at 3-T MR imaging? Mühler MR Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):709. PubMed ID: 15858109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [High radiation exposure by myocardial scintigraphy: Is there a dosage problem?]. Lindner O; Burchert W; Schäfers M Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2011 Mar; 136(12):600. PubMed ID: 21412682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiation dose in close proximity to patients after myocardial perfusion imaging: potential implications for hospital personnel and the public. Tsao CW; Frost LE; Fanning K; Manning WJ; Hauser TH J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jul; 62(4):351-2. PubMed ID: 23665101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Bashore TM Am Heart J; 2004 Mar; 147(3):375-8. PubMed ID: 14999179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiation Exposure in Medical Imaging: Is the Message Out or Just Being Ignored? Miller TD; Phillips LM JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 8(10):1177-1179. PubMed ID: 26481842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare? Einstein AJ Heart; 2008 Dec; 94(12):1519-21. PubMed ID: 19011135 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health effects of low-level radiation: any news? Zeeb H J Radiol Prot; 2012 Sep; 32(3):E11-3. PubMed ID: 22948393 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The current and future status of nuclear cardiology: a consensus report. Underwood SR; de Bondt P; Flotats A; Marcasa C; Pinto F; Schaefer W; Verberne HJ Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Sep; 15(9):949-55. PubMed ID: 24819850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-dose-rate epidemiology of high background radiation areas. Boice JD; Hendry JH; Nakamura N; Niwa O; Nakamura S; Yoshida K Radiat Res; 2010 Jun; 173(6):849-54. PubMed ID: 20518665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetry for epidemiological studies: learning from the past, looking to the future. Simon SL; Bouville A; Kleinerman R; Ron E Radiat Res; 2006 Jul; 166(1 Pt 2):313-8. PubMed ID: 16808617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]