137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21364373)
1. Does multisource feedback influence performance appraisal satisfaction?
Dupee JM; Ernst NP; Caslin KE
Nurs Manage; 2011 Mar; 42(3):12-6. PubMed ID: 21364373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Activity contracting.
Anderson M
Superv Nurse; 1979 Nov; 10(11):55-9. PubMed ID: 260323
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of adherence to policy and procedures.
Kirchhoff KT; Sylwestrak ML; Chenelly S; McLane C
Nurs Manage; 1988 Jan; 19(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 3336525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance management. How to manage--Part. 6.
Martin V
Nurs Times; 2000 May 25-31; 96(21):41. PubMed ID: 11962953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The chaos surrounding faculty evaluation.
Fitzpatrick JJ
Nurs Educ Perspect; 2006; 27(4):177. PubMed ID: 16921798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Using the 360 degrees multisource feedback model to evaluate teaching and professionalism.
Berk RA
Med Teach; 2009 Dec; 31(12):1073-80. PubMed ID: 19995170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance feedback: a question of source credibility.
Stull MK
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Apr; 16(4):17, 39. PubMed ID: 3633964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Developing the performance appraisal system.
Pelle D; Greenhalgh L
Nurs Manage; 1987 Dec; 18(12):37-40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 3696616
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing a primary nursing performance appraisal tool.
Beck S
Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):36-8, 42. PubMed ID: 2294492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Staff nurse performance. Effects of goal-setting and performance feedback.
Stull MK
J Nurs Adm; 1986; 16(7-8):26-30. PubMed ID: 3637221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Professional competence--can it be accurately measured or defined?
Smith C
Nurs Crit Care; 1997; 2(4):186-90. PubMed ID: 9873321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Give-and-take feedback.
Grensing-Pophal L
Nurs Manage; 2000 Feb; 31(2):27-8. PubMed ID: 10827690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Getting 360 degrees feedback right.
Peiperl MA
Harv Bus Rev; 2001 Jan; 79(1):142-7, 177. PubMed ID: 11189458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motivation via an evaluation tool.
Gerberich SG; McLaughlin L; Simon B
Int Nurs Rev; 1978; 25(3):72-7. PubMed ID: 246845
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Articulating professional nursing practice behaviors.
Behrend BJ; Finch DA; Emerick CA; Scoble K
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Feb; 16(2):20-4. PubMed ID: 2418177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Communication: key contributor to effectiveness--a nurse executive responds.
Wolf GA
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Sep; 16(9):26-8. PubMed ID: 3638337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of peer performance-evaluation on job satisfaction.
Milewski R; McKercher PL
Am J Hosp Pharm; 1983 Jul; 40(7):1202-5. PubMed ID: 6881160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost accountability and clinical nurse specialist evaluation.
Tierney MJ; Grant LM; Mazique SI
Nurs Manage; 1990 May; 21(5):26-8, 30-1. PubMed ID: 2110640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Communication: key contributor to effectiveness--the research.
Pincus JD
J Nurs Adm; 1986 Sep; 16(9):19-25. PubMed ID: 3638336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Taking the fear out of peer review.
Parks J; Lindstrom CW
Nurs Manage; 1995 Mar; 26(3):48N, 48P. PubMed ID: 7746577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
