These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21365043)

  • 1. Accuracy of linear measurement and the measurement limits of thin objects with cone beam computed tomography: effects of measurement directions and of phantom locations in the fields of view.
    Tsutsumi K; Chikui T; Okamura K; Yoshiura K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 21365043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography.
    Nackaerts O; Maes F; Yan H; Couto Souza P; Pauwels R; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Aug; 22(8):873-9. PubMed ID: 21244502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Detector efficiency for non-helical trajectory of cone beam reconstruction].
    Li Z; Du M
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 26(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 19334555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of reconstructed images from cone-beam computed tomography scans.
    Lamichane M; Anderson NK; Rigali PH; Seldin EB; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):156.e1-6; discussion 156-7. PubMed ID: 19651340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of surrounding conditions on pixel value of cone beam computed tomography.
    Araki K; Okano T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):862-5. PubMed ID: 22092375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of field-of-view and patient size on CT numbers from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Seet KY; Barghi A; Yartsev S; Van Dyk J
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6251-62. PubMed ID: 19794246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation.
    Scarfe WC; Li Z; Aboelmaaty W; Scott SA; Farman AG
    Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():46-60. PubMed ID: 22376097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital radiography: the standard of care.
    Samaras CD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Oct; 29(8):506, 508-9. PubMed ID: 18935789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?
    Scarfe WC; Farman AG
    Dent Clin North Am; 2008 Oct; 52(4):707-30, v. PubMed ID: 18805225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scatter kernel estimation with an edge-spread function method for cone-beam computed tomography imaging.
    Li H; Mohan R; Zhu XR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(23):6729-48. PubMed ID: 18997269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement of cone beam CT coincidence with megavoltage isocentre and image sharpness using the QUASAR Penta-Guide phantom.
    Sykes JR; Lindsay R; Dean CJ; Brettle DS; Magee DR; Thwaites DI
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Oct; 53(19):5275-93. PubMed ID: 18758000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose calculation accuracy using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy.
    Guan H; Dong H
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6239-50. PubMed ID: 19794241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variance reduction techniques for fast Monte Carlo CBCT scatter correction calculations.
    Mainegra-Hing E; Kawrakow I
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4495-507. PubMed ID: 20668342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dose reduction for kilovotage cone-beam computed tomography in radiation therapy.
    Wang J; Li T; Liang Z; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(11):2897-909. PubMed ID: 18460749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image distortion and spatial resolution of a commercially available cone-beam computed tomography machine.
    Ballrick JW; Palomo JM; Ruch E; Amberman BD; Hans MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 18929276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose calculation on kV cone beam CT images: an investigation of the Hu-density conversion stability and dose accuracy using the site-specific calibration.
    Rong Y; Smilowitz J; Tewatia D; Tomé WA; Paliwal B
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(3):195-207. PubMed ID: 19931031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of geometric distortions on magnetic resonance and cone beam computed tomography images used for planning and verification of high-dose rate brachytherapy cervical cancer treatment.
    Aubry JF; Cheung J; Morin O; Beaulieu L; Hsu IC; Pouliot J
    Brachytherapy; 2010; 9(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 20149759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The study of associated reconstruction using MV linear accelerator and cone-beam CT].
    Liu ZG; Zhao J; Zhuang TG
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2006 Jul; 30(4):271-3. PubMed ID: 17039936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cone-beam reconstruction for the two-circles-plus-one-line trajectory.
    Lu Y; Yang J; Emerson JW; Mao H; Zhou T; Si Y; Jiang M
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 May; 57(9):2689-707. PubMed ID: 22508942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new method to measure directional modulation transfer function using sphere phantoms in a cone beam computed tomography system.
    Lee C; Baek J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2015 Apr; 34(4):902-10. PubMed ID: 25398176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.