These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21365043)

  • 41. Deriving Hounsfield units from the grey scale of a CBCT?
    Bryant J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Jan; 40(1):65; author reply 66. PubMed ID: 21159918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Basis of the flat panel detector and its technological usefulness].
    Nishiki M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Mar; 60(3 Suppl):5-9. PubMed ID: 25532228
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Point/counterpoint. Office-based cone-beam and digital tomosynthesis systems using flat-panel technology should not be referred to as CT units.
    Bushong SC; Balter S; Orton CG
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 21361168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Technical Note: Robust measurement of the slice-sensitivity profile in breast tomosynthesis.
    Maki AK; Mainprize JG; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4803. PubMed ID: 27487898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Future of Imaging.
    Boyd RL
    J Clin Orthod; 2015 Jul; 49(7):425-6, 428. PubMed ID: 26267544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The Hot Seat: Cone-beam computed tomography.
    Graham JW
    J Clin Orthod; 2014 Aug; 48(8):470-3. PubMed ID: 25226039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. CBCT constancy controls: how user-friendly is the new phantom?
    Torgersen G; Møystad A; Hol C; Hellén-Halme K; Edén Strindberg J; Näsström K; Nilsson M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Mar; 121(3):343-4. PubMed ID: 26868473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perfusion in peripheral musculoskeletal structures from dynamic volumetric computed tomography using an en bloc approach.
    Barfett J; Velauthapillai N; Jaskolka JD
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jul; 34(4):626-32. PubMed ID: 20657235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A Novel Restraining Device for Small Animal Imaging Exams: Validation in Rabbits.
    Barbosa CH; Carvalho AC; de Souza S; Machado F; Guedes F; Monteiro A; Schanaider A
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():571729. PubMed ID: 26114109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Implications of Cone Beam CT Peripheral Edge Blurring and Signal Attenuation for Interventional Procedures.
    Holmes RD; Thakur Y; Mallinson P
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):137-141. PubMed ID: 34590161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Cone beam-computer tomography has become a unimaginable in general practice. Yes].
    van der Helm A
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2012 Apr; 119(4):166. PubMed ID: 22567810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Cone beam computed tomography, an overlooked modality in validated image ordering guidelines for odontogenic infections.
    Tofangchiha M; Ramezani K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 51(4):577-578. PubMed ID: 34446295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cone Beam Tomosynthesis: An Emerging Technology for Procedural Image Guidance.
    Conger A; Shah L; Shah V; McCormick Z
    Pain Med; 2020 Oct; 21(10):2610-2613. PubMed ID: 31904847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Profile measurement of an aspheric cylindrical surface from retroreflection.
    Lin DT; Wan DS
    Appl Opt; 1991 Aug; 30(22):3200-4. PubMed ID: 20706375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Systematic effects in the measurement of far-infrared linear polarization.
    Gonatas DP; Wu XD; Novak G; Hildebrand RH
    Appl Opt; 1989 Mar; 28(5):1000-6. PubMed ID: 20548602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Direct measurement of beam-induced fields in accelerating structures.
    Figueroa H; Gai W; Konecny R; Norem J; Ruggiero A; Schoessow P; Simpson J
    Phys Rev Lett; 1988 May; 60(21):2144-2147. PubMed ID: 10038271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Increasing the accuracy of measuring radioactivity in biological objects].
    Krivoruk ISh
    Med Radiol (Mosk); 1970 Dec; 15(12):39-42. PubMed ID: 5500858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of Orthodontic Mini-Implant Placement in the Maxillary Anterior Alveolar Region in 15 Patients by Cone Beam Computed Tomography at a Single Center in South India.
    Murugesan A; Dinesh SPS; Muthuswamy Pandian S; Ashwin Solanki L; Alshehri A; Awadh W; Alzahrani KJ; Alsharif KF; Alnfiai MM; Mathew R; El-Bialy T; Baeshen HA; Bhandi S; Raj AT; Patil S
    Med Sci Monit; 2022 Oct; 28():e937949. PubMed ID: 36284468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Bone quality affects stability of orthodontic miniscrews.
    Yu WP; Tsai MT; Yu JH; Huang HL; Hsu JT
    Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):2849. PubMed ID: 35181736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Implant-to-nasal floor dimensions projected by panoramic radiographs in the maxillary incisor-canine region: implications for dental implant treatment.
    Bertram A; Eckert AW; Emshoff R
    Odontology; 2022 Jan; 110(1):171-182. PubMed ID: 34191207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.