These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21365046)
1. Mechanical and histomorphometric evaluations of rough titanium implants treated with hydrofluoric acid/nitric acid solution in rabbit tibia. He FM; Yang GL; Zhao SF; Cheng ZP Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 21365046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model. Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on early bone formation surrounding dental implants. Svanborg LM; Hoffman M; Andersson M; Currie F; Kjellin P; Wennerberg A Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 21111575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant. He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs. Schliephake H; Hefti T; Schlottig F; Gédet P; Staedt H J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Sep; 37(9):818-28. PubMed ID: 20573183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure. Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osseointegration and stability of a modified sand-blasted acid-etched implant: an experimental pilot study in sheep. Abdel-Haq J; Karabuda CZ; Arısan V; Mutlu Z; Kürkçü M Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):265-74. PubMed ID: 20946211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical and histomorphometric characterizations of osseointegration during mini-screw healing in rabbit tibiae. Wu J; Bai YX; Wang BK Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):558-63. PubMed ID: 19413379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone. Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats. Marinho VC; Celletti R; Bracchetti G; Petrone G; Minkin C; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 12608672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vivo comparison of bone formation on titanium implant surfaces coated with biomimetically deposited calcium phosphate or electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite. Yang GL; He FM; Song E; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 20657861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias. Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants coated with fibroblast growth factor-fibronectin (FGF-FN) fusion protein. Park JM; Koak JY; Jang JH; Han CH; Kim SK; Heo SJ Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(6):859-66. PubMed ID: 17190295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Orsini G; Assenza B; Scarano A; Piattelli M; Piattelli A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of supramicron roughness characteristics produced by 1- and 2-step acid etching on the osseointegration capability of titanium. Att W; Tsukimura N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):719-28. PubMed ID: 17974105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants. Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur. Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thin bioactive ceramic-coated alumina-blasted/acid-etched implant surface enhances biomechanical fixation of implants: an experimental study in dogs. Granato R; Marin C; Gil JN; Chuang SK; Dodson TB; Suzuki M; Coelho PG Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 13(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 19681928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]