163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21365474)
1. A tale of two perspectives: regulation versus self-regulation. A financial reporting approach (from Sarbanes-Oxley) for research ethics.
Richman V; Richman A
Sci Eng Ethics; 2012 Jun; 18(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 21365474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Governance in the spotlight: what the Sarbanes-Oxley Act means for you.
Orlikoff JE; Totten M
Trustee; 2004 Sep; 57(8):15-8. PubMed ID: 15471313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. AICPA standard aids in detecting risk factors for fraud. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Reinstein A; Dery RJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1999 Oct; 53(10):48-50. PubMed ID: 11066667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sarbanes-Oxley raises red flag for not-for-profits.
O'Hare PK
Healthc Financ Manage; 2002 Oct; 56(10):42-4. PubMed ID: 12373954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Looking harder. The audit committee under Sarbanes-Oxley.
Greene J
Trustee; 2005 Jan; 58(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 15916357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Executive defensive. As the Scrushy case finally goes before an Alabama jury, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and its impact are also on trial.
Mantone J
Mod Healthc; 2005 Jan; 35(5):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 15729919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why good accountants do bad audits.
Bazerman MH; Loewenstein G; Moore DA
Harv Bus Rev; 2002 Nov; 80(11):96-102, 134. PubMed ID: 12422793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Financial reporting practices: a comprehensive evaluation.
Godwin NH; Mueller JM
J Healthc Qual; 2005; 27(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 16190310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On the potential cost effectiveness of scientific audits.
Click JL
Account Res; 1989 Sep; 1(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 26859058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hard to handle. New guidance helps boards navigate Sarbanes-Oxley.
Barr P
Mod Healthc; 2005 Aug; 35(32):17. PubMed ID: 16117080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. No One Likes a Snitch.
Redman B; Caplan A
Sci Eng Ethics; 2015 Aug; 21(4):813-9. PubMed ID: 24935246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Research ethics and scientific misconduct in biomedical research.
Kansu E; Ruacan S
Acta Neurochir Suppl; 2002; 83():11-5. PubMed ID: 12442615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Integrity in science: a constant concern].
Drenth PJ
Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):321-33. PubMed ID: 15641563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Looking harder. Not-for-profit hospitals use Sarbanes-Oxley to strengthen their boards' financial accountability.
Greene J
Hosp Health Netw; 2005 Jun; 79(6):52-4, 56-8, 2. PubMed ID: 16047623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Scrushy's setback. Judge denies motion to toss Sarbanes-Oxley charges.
Mantone J
Mod Healthc; 2004 Dec; 34(49):7. PubMed ID: 15669139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. From Baltimore to Bell Labs: reflections on two decades of debate about scientific misconduct.
Resnik DB
Account Res; 2003; 10(2):123-35. PubMed ID: 14577424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The unexpected benefits of Sarbanes-Oxley.
Wagner S; Dittmar L
Harv Bus Rev; 2006 Apr; 84(4):133-40; 150. PubMed ID: 16579420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicare changes create accounting, reporting, and auditing problems. Task Force on Federal Health Care Legislation, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Healthc Financ Manage; 1984 Nov; 38(11):28-38. PubMed ID: 10315622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ambiguity, trust, and the responsible conduct of research.
Grinnell F
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):205-14. PubMed ID: 11657858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Higher standards. Fitch presses not-for-profits to comply with Sarbanes-Oxley rules.
Barr P
Mod Healthc; 2005 Aug; 35(33):9, 12. PubMed ID: 16124720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
