107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21365682)
1. Absolute quality evaluation of protein model structures using statistical potentials with respect to the native and reference states.
Shirota M; Ishida T; Kinoshita K
Proteins; 2011 May; 79(5):1550-63. PubMed ID: 21365682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of a new meta-score for protein structure prediction from seven all-atom distance dependent potentials using support vector regression.
Shirota M; Ishida T; Kinoshita K
Genome Inform; 2009 Oct; 23(1):149-58. PubMed ID: 20180270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement of statistical potentials and threading score functions using information maximization.
Solis AD; Rackovsky S
Proteins; 2006 Mar; 62(4):892-908. PubMed ID: 16395676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.
Mooij WT; Verdonk ML
Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(2):272-87. PubMed ID: 16106379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Distinguishing native conformations of proteins from decoys with an effective free energy estimator based on the OPLS all-atom force field and the Surface Generalized Born solvent model.
Felts AK; Gallicchio E; Wallqvist A; Levy RM
Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(2):404-22. PubMed ID: 12112706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Potential for assessing quality of protein structure based on contact number prediction.
Ishida T; Nakamura S; Shimizu K
Proteins; 2006 Sep; 64(4):940-7. PubMed ID: 16788993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can a physics-based, all-atom potential find a protein's native structure among misfolded structures? I. Large scale AMBER benchmarking.
Wroblewska L; Skolnick J
J Comput Chem; 2007 Sep; 28(12):2059-66. PubMed ID: 17407093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identifying native-like protein structures using physics-based potentials.
Dominy BN; Brooks CL
J Comput Chem; 2002 Jan; 23(1):147-60. PubMed ID: 11913380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Atomically detailed potentials to recognize native and approximate protein structures.
Qiu J; Elber R
Proteins; 2005 Oct; 61(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 16080157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.
Tsai J; Bonneau R; Morozov AV; Kuhlman B; Rohl CA; Baker D
Proteins; 2003 Oct; 53(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 12945051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A beta-complex statistical four body contact potential combined with a hydrogen bond statistical potential recognizes the correct native structure from protein decoy sets.
Sánchez-González G; Kim JK; Kim DS; Garduño-Juárez R
Proteins; 2013 Aug; 81(8):1420-33. PubMed ID: 23568277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fragment-based local statistical potentials derived by combining an alphabet of protein local structures with secondary structures and solvent accessibilities.
Li Q; Zhou C; Liu H
Proteins; 2009 Mar; 74(4):820-36. PubMed ID: 18704928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ProVal: a protein-scoring function for the selection of native and near-native folds.
Berglund A; Head RD; Welsh EA; Marshall GR
Proteins; 2004 Feb; 54(2):289-302. PubMed ID: 14696191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment.
Benkert P; Tosatto SC; Schomburg D
Proteins; 2008 Apr; 71(1):261-77. PubMed ID: 17932912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia.
Bhattacharya A; Tejero R; Montelione GT
Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 17186527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhanced sampling near the native conformation using statistical potentials for local side-chain and backbone interactions.
Fang Q; Shortle D
Proteins; 2005 Jul; 60(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 15852306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computational modeling of protein mutant stability: analysis and optimization of statistical potentials and structural features reveal insights into prediction model development.
Parthiban V; Gromiha MM; Abhinandan M; Schomburg D
BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Aug; 7():54. PubMed ID: 17705837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of protein structure by evaluation of sequence-structure fitness. Aligning sequences to contact profiles derived from three-dimensional structures.
Ouzounis C; Sander C; Scharf M; Schneider R
J Mol Biol; 1993 Aug; 232(3):805-25. PubMed ID: 8355272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Statistical geometry based prediction of nonsynonymous SNP functional effects using random forest and neuro-fuzzy classifiers.
Barenboim M; Masso M; Vaisman II; Jamison DC
Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1930-9. PubMed ID: 18186470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
