These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2136667)
21. Antitrust law and the medical staff. Holthaus D Trustee; 1988 Jul; 41(7):23. PubMed ID: 10288093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Legal aspects of peer review. Patrick v Burget in the U.S. Supreme Court: its impact on peer review. Couch JB Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 May; 3(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 2980931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The legal perspective. How much process is due? Johnson RL Trustee; 1979 Oct; 32(10):12-4, 16, 19-20. PubMed ID: 10289216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Duties and potential liability of nonhospital entities in credentialing physicians. Griffith RL Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 10160755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Supreme Court decides Patrick; peer review alive and well despite ruling. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1988 Jun; 11(13):1-5. PubMed ID: 10287418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Medical peer review of physician competence and performance: legal immunity and the antitrust laws. Curran WJ N Engl J Med; 1987 Mar; 316(10):597-8. PubMed ID: 3807954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. How to defend your hospital privileges. Chenen AR Med Econ; 1991 Nov; 68(21):71, 75-6, 78-9. PubMed ID: 10114582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Perspectives. The Patrick case: implications for peer review. Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1988 May; 42(22):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10287491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Oregon case raises questions about peer review. Davis CD Healthtexas; 1989 Jan; 44(7):7. PubMed ID: 10313055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The evolution of medical staff credentialing. Baxter MJ; Hornback M Med Staff Couns; 1993; 7(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 10123459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Peer review splits Calif. medical community. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1988 Oct; 18(44):98. PubMed ID: 10290221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Staff privileges--$2 million antitrust judgment reversed. Carlson DR Health Law Vigil; 1986 Oct; 9(21):1-4. PubMed ID: 10284024 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services and the implications for education in quality assessment: Part IV. Hershey N Qual Assur Util Rev; 1990 Nov; 5(4):130-7. PubMed ID: 2136677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Antitrust. Is quality review in jeopardy? Pollner F Med World News; 1988 Jun; 29(12):34-6, 38, 43-7. PubMed ID: 10287973 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Patrick v. Burget; will the state action doctrine protect bad faith peer review? Healthspan; 1988 Feb; 5(2):20-2. PubMed ID: 10288650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Recent decision leaves gap in peer review discovery protections. Pagano v. Oroville Hospital. Wisch CJ; Penner IE Health Care Law Newsl; 1993 Jul; 8(7):8-12. PubMed ID: 10183883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Current legal developments in medical staff credentialing disputes. Callahan MR; Vocke DN New Dir Ment Health Serv; 1989; (41):81-93. PubMed ID: 2716726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Liability for peer review and privilege suspension. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1984 Jul; 40(2):42. PubMed ID: 10267575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. High court's override on Patrick renews concerns about peer review risk. Halper HR; Kazon PM Bus Health; 1988 Jul; 5(9):40-1. PubMed ID: 10288490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]