These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2136677)
1. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services and the implications for education in quality assessment: Part IV. Hershey N Qual Assur Util Rev; 1990 Nov; 5(4):130-7. PubMed ID: 2136677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services: Part III. Hershey N Qual Assur Util Rev; 1990 May; 5(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 2136667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services: Part II. Hershey N; Bontempo LC Qual Assur Util Rev; 1990 Feb; 5(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 2136661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HCQIA's grant of immunity: panacea or Pandora's box. Scott C Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Jan; 9(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 10116004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of Patrick v. Burget on peer review. Gainer PS; Miles JJ Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):13-21. PubMed ID: 10290181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Legal aspects of peer review. Patrick v Burget in the U.S. Supreme Court: its impact on peer review. Couch JB Qual Assur Util Rev; 1988 May; 3(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 2980931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality assurance implications of federal peer review laws. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the National Practitioner Data Bank. Snelson E Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1603858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Compensation and accountability: the way to improve peer review. Hershey N Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 1603859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of external peer review after the Health Care Quality Improvement Act and Patrick v. Burget. Couch JB; Kauffman A; Merry M Qual Assur Util Rev; 1989 Aug; 4(3):86-8. PubMed ID: 2535582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective peer review at Brooke Army Medical Center. Zaloznik AJ; Montgomery RM Perspect Healthc Risk Manage; 1992; 12(1):6-8. PubMed ID: 10116283 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data. Stevens M Health Law Can; 1989; 9(3):79-82. PubMed ID: 10313023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review immunity after Patrick v. Burget. Kelly JP Healthspan; 1988 Jun; 5(6):2-5. PubMed ID: 10288658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Patrick v. Burget; will the state action doctrine protect bad faith peer review? Healthspan; 1988 Feb; 5(2):20-2. PubMed ID: 10288650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits. Purtell DL Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical peer review in the United States: history, legal development and subsequent abuse. Vyas D; Hozain AE World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 20(21):6357-63. PubMed ID: 24914357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strategies for eliminating unfairness in peer review. Rozovsky FA; Rozovsky LE Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 10115449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Putting HCQIA (Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986) to the test. QRC Advis; 1992 Jul; 8(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 10183677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing peer review in the quest for improved medical services. Hershey N; Bontempo LC Qual Assur Util Rev; 1989 Nov; 4(4):94-100. PubMed ID: 2535587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Federal court finds immunity under HCQIA. Rogers v. Columbia/HCA of Central Louisiana. Hosp Law Newsl; 1998 Oct; 15(12):6-8. PubMed ID: 10186229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]