These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21367577)

  • 21. Cochlear implanted children present vocal parameters within normal standards.
    de Souza LB; Bevilacqua MC; Brasolotto AG; Coelho AC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Aug; 76(8):1180-3. PubMed ID: 22652499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of speech production in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Poissant SF; Peters KA; Robb MP
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jul; 70(7):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16460814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of soft palate implants on acoustic characteristics of voice and articulation.
    Akpinar ME; Kocak I; Gurpinar B; Esen HE
    J Voice; 2011 May; 25(3):381-6. PubMed ID: 20434875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acoustic comparison of vowel sounds among adult females.
    Franca MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):671.e9-17. PubMed ID: 22285451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Qualitative analysis of voice and speech in patients with cochlear implant-- preliminary results].
    Kosztyła-Hojna B; Rogowski M; Kasperuk J; Rutkowski R; Ryćko P
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2009 Oct; 27(160):305-10. PubMed ID: 19928659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Correlation of cochlear nerve size and auditory performance after cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf patients.
    Kim BG; Chung HJ; Park JJ; Park S; Kim SH; Choi JY
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jun; 139(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 23787419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Longitudinal changes in children's speech and voice physiology after cochlear implantation.
    Higgins MB; McCleary EA; Carney AE; Schulte L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):48-70. PubMed ID: 12598813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Changes of the late acoustically evoked potentials in postlingually deaf patients with cochlear implants].
    Schmidt R; Kaftan H; Hosemann W; Gräbel S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 Mar; 84(3):182-6. PubMed ID: 15770566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Acoustic and Aerodynamic Analyses of the Voice of Prelingually Deaf Young Men After Cochlear Implantation.
    Wang Y; Yang J; Liang F; Liu J; Liang M; Zhang X; Chen W; Zheng Y
    J Voice; 2021 Nov; 35(6):838-842. PubMed ID: 32430161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of hearing aid amplification on voice F0 variability in speakers with prelingual hearing loss.
    Lee GS; Liu C; Lee SH
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():1-8. PubMed ID: 23648550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vowel perception: experiments with a single-electrode cochlear implant.
    Doyle KJ; Danhauer JL; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):179-92. PubMed ID: 3755193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A voice acoustic analysis of thyroid adenoma patients after a unilateral thyroid lobectomy.
    Li C; Tao Z; Qu J; Zhou T; Xia F
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):e23-6. PubMed ID: 21530164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Acoustic analysis of the normal voice in nonsmoking adults].
    Fernández Liesa R; Damborenea Tajada D; Rueda Gormedino P; García y García E; Leache Pueyo J; Campos del Alamo MA; Llorente Arenas E; Naya Gálvez MJ
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 1999 Mar; 50(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 10217688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Vocal characteristics during child development: perceptual-auditory and acoustic data.
    Lopes LW; Lima IL; Azevedo EH; de Lima-Silva MF; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida LN; de Almeida AA
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 24296522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Differentiated vocal tract control and the reliability of interpretations of nasendoscopic assessment.
    Madill C; Sheard C; Heard R
    J Voice; 2010 May; 24(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 19660904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Use of Voice Cues for Speaker Gender Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Meister H; Fürsen K; Streicher B; Lang-Roth R; Walger M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):546-56. PubMed ID: 27135985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The acoustic analysis of voice in patients with multi-channel cochlear implant.
    Szyfter W; Pruszewicz A; Woznica B; Swidzinski P; Szymiec E; Karlik M
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1996; 117(3):225-7. PubMed ID: 9102730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of the effects of Voice Massage and voice hygiene lecture on self-reported vocal well-being and acoustic and perceptual speech parameters in female teachers.
    Leppänen K; Laukkanen AM; Ilomäki I; Vilkman E
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(4):227-38. PubMed ID: 19590222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The vocal clarity of female speech-language pathology students: an exploratory study.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Heard R; Yiu E
    J Voice; 2012 Jan; 26(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 21439779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.