These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Saliency does not account for fixations to eyes within social scenes. Birmingham E; Bischof WF; Kingstone A Vision Res; 2009 Dec; 49(24):2992-3000. PubMed ID: 19782100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Animal detection and identification in natural scenes: image statistics and emotional valence. Naber M; Hilger M; Einhäuser W J Vis; 2012 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 22281692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The time course of initial scene processing for eye movement guidance in natural scene search. Võ ML; Henderson JM J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):14.1-13. PubMed ID: 20377291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment. Mack SC; Eckstein MP J Vis; 2011 Aug; 11(9):1-16. PubMed ID: 21856869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence for two distinct mechanisms directing gaze in natural scenes. Mackay M; Cerf M; Koch C J Vis; 2012 Apr; 12(4):9. PubMed ID: 22510977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pattern matching is assessed in retinotopic coordinates. McKyton A; Pertzov Y; Zohary E J Vis; 2009 Dec; 9(13):19.1-10. PubMed ID: 20055552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition. Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting the human reaction time based on natural image statistics in a rapid categorization task. Mirzaei A; Khaligh-Razavi SM; Ghodrati M; Zabbah S; Ebrahimpour R Vision Res; 2013 Apr; 81():36-44. PubMed ID: 23419619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Search time critically depends on irrelevant subset size in visual search. Benjamins JS; Hooge IT; van Elst JC; Wertheim AH; Verstraten FA Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(3):398-406. PubMed ID: 19068222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do low spatial frequencies explain the extremely fast saccades towards human faces? Guyader N; Chauvin A; Boucart M; Peyrin C Vision Res; 2017 Apr; 133():100-111. PubMed ID: 28202396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Word processing speed in peripheral vision measured with a saccadic choice task. Chanceaux M; Vitu F; Bendahman L; Thorpe S; Grainger J Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 56():10-9. PubMed ID: 22306679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Animals roll around the clock: the rotation invariance of ultrarapid visual processing. Guyonneau R; Kirchner H; Thorpe SJ J Vis; 2006 Sep; 6(10):1008-17. PubMed ID: 17132073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Võ ML; Henderson JM J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Asymmetries in the direction of saccades during perception of scenes and fractals: effects of image type and image features. Foulsham T; Kingstone A Vision Res; 2010 Apr; 50(8):779-95. PubMed ID: 20144645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Active search for multiple targets is inefficient. Verghese P Vision Res; 2012 Dec; 74():61-71. PubMed ID: 22929812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]