These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Bialveolar protrusion in a Zimbabwean sample. Dandajena TC; Nanda RS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 12594418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effects of camouflage treatment on dentofacial structures in Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathic patients. Demir A; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA Eur J Orthod; 2005 Oct; 27(5):524-31. PubMed ID: 16049038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cephalometric standards for white Brazilians. Cerci V; Martins JE; de Oliveira MA Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 8182299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A cephalometric evaluation of American Negro women. Fonseca RJ; Klein WD Am J Orthod; 1978 Feb; 73(2):152-60. PubMed ID: 272851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Craniofacial structure of Anatolian Turkish adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Basciftci FA; Uysal T; Buyukerkmen A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Mar; 125(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 15014417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Three-dimensional cephalometric norms of Chinese adults in Hong Kong with balanced facial profile. Cheung LK; Chan YM; Jayaratne YS; Lo J Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):e56-73. PubMed ID: 21665497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study. Lee YJ; Park JT; Cha JY Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Sep; 148(3):405-13. PubMed ID: 26321338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Computer-Aided Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Comparative Study with the Establishment of Burstone Analysis-Derived 3D Norms. Ho CT; Denadai R; Lai HC; Lo LJ; Lin HH J Clin Med; 2019 Dec; 8(12):. PubMed ID: 31810228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II division 1 malocclusion. Lau JW; Hägg U Br Dent J; 1999 Feb; 186(4 Spec No):188-90. PubMed ID: 10205956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Correlations between cephalometric and photographic measurements of facial attractiveness in Chinese and US patients after orthodontic treatment. Oh HS; Korn EL; Zhang X; Liu Y; Xu T; Boyd R; Baumrind S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):762.e1-14; discussion 762-3. PubMed ID: 19962590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cephalometric norms for a Moroccan population. Ousehal L; Lazrak L; Chafii A Int Orthod; 2012 Mar; 10(1):122-34. PubMed ID: 22236522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Which cephalometric analysis for maxillo-mandibular surgery in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome? Brevi B; Di Blasio A; Di Blasio C; Piazza F; D'Ascanio L; Sesenna E Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2015 Oct; 35(5):332-7. PubMed ID: 26824915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Cephalometric norms in Japanese adults. Alcalde RE; Jinno T; Pogrel MA; Matsumura T J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 56(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 9461133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative study of the soft tissue of young Japanese-Brazilian, Caucasian and Mongoloid patients. Fernandes TM; Pinzan A; Sathler R; de Freitas MR; Janson G; Vieira FP Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 23916441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence. Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]