315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21368433)
1. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs.
Byrne DC; Davis RR; Shaw PB; Specht BM; Holland AN
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):86-92. PubMed ID: 21368433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development and validation of a field microphone-in-real-ear approach for measuring hearing protector attenuation.
Berger EH; Voix J; Kieper RW; Le Cocq C
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):163-75. PubMed ID: 21368442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individual fit-testing of earplugs: a review of uses.
Schulz TY
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):152-62. PubMed ID: 21368441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of noise attenuation and verbal communication capabilities using three ear insert hearing protection systems among airport maintenance personnel.
Wagoner L; McGlothlin J; Chung K; Strickland E; Zimmerman N; Carlson G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Feb; 4(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 17175514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fit-testing hearing protectors: an idea whose time has come.
Hager LD
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):147-51. PubMed ID: 21368440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Variability of real-world hearing protector attenuation measurements.
Neitzel R; Somers S; Seixas N
Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Oct; 50(7):679-91. PubMed ID: 16782739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech intelligibility and passive, level-dependent earplugs.
Norin JA; Emanuel DC; Letowski TR
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):642-9. PubMed ID: 21407078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consistency of attenuation across multiple fittings of custom and non-custom earplugs.
Tufts JB; Jahn KN; Byram JP
Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 Jun; 57(5):571-80. PubMed ID: 23267007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sound attenuation from earmuffs and earplugs in combination: maximum benefits vs. missed information.
Abel SM; Odell P
Aviat Space Environ Med; 2006 Sep; 77(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 16964737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A qualitative assessment of the performance of electronic, level-dependent earmuffs when used on firing ranges.
Williams W
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):189-94. PubMed ID: 21368444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise.
Morata TC; Gong W; Tikka C; Samelli AG; Verbeek JH
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2024 May; 5(5):CD015066. PubMed ID: 38757544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heat and humidity buildup under earmuff-type hearing protectors.
Davis RR; Shaw PB
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):93-8. PubMed ID: 21368434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.
Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R
J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Group mean hearing threshold changes in a noise-exposed industrial population using personal hearing protectors.
Savell JF; Toothman EH
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1987 Jan; 48(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 3565259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech recognition in noise under hearing protection: A computational study of the combined effects of hearing loss and hearing protector attenuation.
Giguère C; Berger EH
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55 Suppl 1():S30-40. PubMed ID: 26840922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation.
Murphy WJ; Stephenson MR; Byrne DC; Witt B; Duran J
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):132-41. PubMed ID: 21368438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perception of hearing protectors by workers that participate in hearing preservation programs: a preliminary study.
Gonçalves CG; Lüders D; Guirado DS; Albizu EJ; Marques JM
Codas; 2015; 27(4):309-18. PubMed ID: 26398252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Introduction to the special issue: hearing protection state of the art.
Davis RR
Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):85. PubMed ID: 21368432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
