These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21369468)

  • 1. Phaco Prechop versus Divide and Conquer Phacoemulsification: A Prospective Comparative Interventional Study.
    Elnaby EA; El Zawahry OM; Abdelrahman AM; Ibrahim HE
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2008 Jul; 15(3):123-7. PubMed ID: 21369468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer, and stop-and-chop phaco techniques in microincision coaxial cataract surgery.
    Park J; Yum HR; Kim MS; Harrison AR; Kim EC
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1463-9. PubMed ID: 23910714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the reverse chopper-assisted prechop and phaco-chop nucleotomy techniques during phacoemulsification for cataracts with grade III nuclei: a randomized controlled trial.
    Tao J; Wan Y; Song X
    Ann Transl Med; 2023 Jan; 11(2):105. PubMed ID: 36819536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of prechop technique in phacoemulsification for cataract patients with highly liquefied vitreous: a retrospective study.
    Zhao J; Li Z; Liu Y; Han X; Huang S
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):167. PubMed ID: 35421948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Endothelial cell damage after cataract surgery: divide-and-conquer versus phaco-chop technique.
    Storr-Paulsen A; Norregaard JC; Ahmed S; Storr-Paulsen T; Pedersen TH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jun; 34(6):996-1000. PubMed ID: 18499008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
    Gigliola S; Sborgia G; Niro A; Palmisano C; Puzo P; Giuliani G; Sborgia L; Sisto D; Pastore V; Furino C; Donghia R; Sborgia A; Boscia F; Alessio G
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2021; 14(12):1868-1875. PubMed ID: 34926201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cumulative Dissipated Energy (CDE) in Three Phaco-Fragmentation Techniques for Dense Cataract Removal.
    Fernández-Muñoz E; Chávez-Romero Y; Rivero-Gómez R; Aridjis R; Gonzalez-Salinas R
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():2405-2412. PubMed ID: 37605764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of the Cystotome-Assisted Prechop and Phaco-Chop Phacoemulsification Nucleotomy Techniques.
    Wu LQ; Chen X; An XL; Zhou YW; Bi S
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Dec; 25():10205-10211. PubMed ID: 31891939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phacoemulsification time and power requirements in phaco chop and divide and conquer nucleofractis techniques.
    Wong T; Hingorani M; Lee V
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Sep; 26(9):1374-8. PubMed ID: 11020623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phaco-Chop versus Divide-and-Conquer in Patients Who Underwent Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Guedes J; Pereira SF; Amaral DC; Hespanhol LC; Faneli AC; Oliveira RDC; Mora-Paez DJ; Fontes BM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2024; 18():1535-1546. PubMed ID: 38827775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of divide and conquer and phaco-chop techniques during fluid-based phaco-emulsification.
    Tsorbatzoglou A; Módis L; Kertész K; Németh G; Berta A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2007; 17(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 17534809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of energy required for phaco-chop and divide and conquer phacoemulsification.
    DeBry P; Olson RJ; Crandall AS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 May; 24(5):689-92. PubMed ID: 9610455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Central corneal thickness assessment after phacoemulsification: Subluxation versus Divide-and-Conquer.
    Jeancolas AL; Lhuillier L; Renaudin L; Boiche M; Ghetemme C; Goetz C; Ouamara N; Perone JM
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Nov; 40(9):744-750. PubMed ID: 29050928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative clinical trial of ultrasound phacoemulsification with and without the WhiteStar system.
    Fishkind W; Bakewell B; Donnenfeld ED; Rose AD; Watkins LA; Olson RJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jan; 32(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 16516777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of phacoemulsification time on the corneal endothelium using phacofracture and phaco chop techniques.
    Pirazzoli G; D'Eliseo D; Ziosi M; Acciarri R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996 Sep; 22(7):967-9. PubMed ID: 9041091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cataract phacoemulsification techniques: "divide and conquer" versus "stop and chop"--comparative evaluation of operation course and early results].
    Mierzejewski A; Kałluzny JJ; Kałuzny B; Eliks I
    Klin Oczna; 2004; 106(4-5):612-7. PubMed ID: 15646480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Central corneal thickness changes following manual small incision cataract surgery versus phacoemulsification for white cataract.
    Kongsap P
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2019; 63(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 31198899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of a prechop technique using a reverse chopper in small pupil cataract surgery.
    Yang K; Song C; Li J; Zhang W; Liu Z; Zhao Y
    Ann Transl Med; 2020 Sep; 8(18):1189. PubMed ID: 33241038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of early corneal endothelial cell loss in bimanual microincision cataract surgery (MICS) in comparison with standard phacoemulsification.
    Wilczynski M; Drobniewski I; Synder A; Omulecki W
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2006; 16(6):798-803. PubMed ID: 17191184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Drill-and-prechop technique: modification of the drill-and-crack technique for mature cataracts.
    Xu M; Qi Y; Weng Y; Yang Y; Deng J; Liu W; Mo T; Ye X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):449. PubMed ID: 36419018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.