These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21370496)

  • 1. The response of cranial biomechanical finite element models to variations in mesh density.
    Bright JA; Rayfield EJ
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2011 Apr; 294(4):610-20. PubMed ID: 21370496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subject-specific finite element simulation of the human femur considering inhomogeneous material properties: a straightforward method and convergence study.
    Hölzer A; Schröder C; Woiczinski M; Sadoghi P; Scharpf A; Heimkes B; Jansson V
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2013 Apr; 110(1):82-8. PubMed ID: 23084242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An improved method for finite element mesh generation of geometrically complex structures with application to the skullbase.
    Camacho DL; Hopper RH; Lin GM; Myers BS
    J Biomech; 1997 Oct; 30(10):1067-70. PubMed ID: 9391875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The importance of craniofacial sutures in biomechanical finite element models of the domestic pig.
    Bright JA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(2):e31769. PubMed ID: 22363727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison between automatically generated linear and parabolic tetrahedra when used to mesh a human femur.
    Polgar K; Viceconti M; O'Connor JJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2001; 215(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 11323989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Functional implications of dicynodont cranial suture morphology.
    Jasinoski SC; Rayfield EJ; Chinsamy A
    J Morphol; 2010 Jun; 271(6):705-28. PubMed ID: 20077504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Establishment of a 3D finite element model of human skull using MSCT images and mimics software].
    Huang P; Li ZD; Shao Y; Zou DH; Liu NG; Li L; Chen YY; Wan L; Chen YJ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 27(1):1-4, 8. PubMed ID: 21542216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analysis of the mechanical parameters used for finite element compression of a high-resolution 3D breast phantom.
    Hsu CM; Palmeri ML; Segars WP; Veress AI; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5756-70. PubMed ID: 21992390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tetrahedral versus hexahedral finite elements in numerical modelling of the proximal femur.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    Med Eng Phys; 2006 Nov; 28(9):916-24. PubMed ID: 16464628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanics of the rostrum in crocodilians: a comparative analysis using finite-element modeling.
    McHenry CR; Clausen PD; Daniel WJ; Meers MB; Pendharkar A
    Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol; 2006 Aug; 288(8):827-49. PubMed ID: 16835925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Convergence analysis of a finite element skull model of Herpestes javanicus (Carnivora, Mammalia): implications for robust comparative inferences of biomechanical function.
    Tseng ZJ; Flynn JJ
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Jan; 365():112-48. PubMed ID: 25445190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development and validation of patient-specific finite element models of the hemipelvis generated from a sparse CT data set.
    Shim VB; Pitto RP; Streicher RM; Hunter PJ; Anderson IA
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051010. PubMed ID: 19045517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finite element simulation of articular contact mechanics with quadratic tetrahedral elements.
    Maas SA; Ellis BJ; Rawlins DS; Weiss JA
    J Biomech; 2016 Mar; 49(5):659-667. PubMed ID: 26900037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity and ex vivo validation of finite element models of the domestic pig cranium.
    Bright JA; Rayfield EJ
    J Anat; 2011 Oct; 219(4):456-71. PubMed ID: 21718316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A convenient scheme for coupling a finite element curvilinear mesh to a finite element voxel mesh: application to the heart.
    Hopenfeld B
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Nov; 5():60. PubMed ID: 17112373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Large-scale finite element analysis of human cancellous bone tissue micro computer tomography data: a convergence study.
    Chen Y; Pani M; Taddei F; Mazzà C; Li X; Viceconti M
    J Biomech Eng; 2014 Oct; 136(10):101013. PubMed ID: 25070476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of the effect of mesh density on the material property discretisation within QCT based FE models: a practical example using the implanted proximal tibia.
    Perillo-Marcone A; Alonso-Vazquez A; Taylor M
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Feb; 6(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 12623434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mesh considerations for finite element blast modelling in biomechanics.
    Panzer MB; Myers BS; Bass CR
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2013; 16(6):612-21. PubMed ID: 22185582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A universal algorithm for an improved finite element mesh generation Mesh quality assessment in comparison to former automated mesh-generators and an analytic model.
    Kaminsky J; Rodt T; Gharabaghi A; Forster J; Brand G; Samii M
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Jun; 27(5):383-94. PubMed ID: 15863347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discretization error when using finite element models: analysis and evaluation of an underestimated problem.
    Schmidt H; Alber T; Wehner T; Blakytny R; Wilke HJ
    J Biomech; 2009 Aug; 42(12):1926-34. PubMed ID: 19501362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.