These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2137144)

  • 1. Use of the magnitude estimation technique for assessing the performance of text-to-speech synthesis systems.
    Pavlovic CV; Rossi M; Espesser R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jan; 87(1):373-82. PubMed ID: 2137144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the intelligibility of some low cost speech synthesis devices.
    Keating DL; Evans AL; Wyper DJ; Cunningham E
    Br J Disord Commun; 1986 Aug; 21(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 2950912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The intelligibility of synthesized speech: ECHO II versus VOTRAX.
    Hoover J; Reichle J; Van Tasell D; Cole D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):425-31. PubMed ID: 2959817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech-driven environmental control systems--a qualitative analysis of users' perceptions.
    Judge S; Robertson Z; Hawley M; Enderby P
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2009 May; 4(3):151-7. PubMed ID: 19378210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Segmental intelligibility of synthetic speech produced by rule.
    Logan JS; Greene BG; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Aug; 86(2):566-81. PubMed ID: 2527884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tactile perception.
    Rosen S; Fourcin AJ; Douek EE; Walliker JR; Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 1983 Aug; 17(3):213-4. PubMed ID: 6227355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Towards standardisation of communication and control systems for motor impaired people.
    Morasso P; Penso M; Suetta GP; Tagliasco V
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1979 Jul; 17(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 159988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Providing for operation of tactile paging devices for the deaf, blind, and physically handicapped: Federal Communications Commission. Proposed rule making.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Dec; 44(234):69689-92. PubMed ID: 10313633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech intelligibility of two voice output communication aids.
    Kannenberg P; Marquardt TP; Larson J
    J Commun Disord; 1988 Feb; 21(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 2963839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Augmentative modes of communication for the severely speech- and motor-impaired.
    Vanderheiden GC
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1980 May; (148):70-86. PubMed ID: 6445805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic versus inductive coupling of hearing aids to telephones.
    Lowe RG; Goldstein DP
    Ear Hear; 1982; 3(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 6214443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The intelligibility of synthesized speech in data inquiry systems.
    Marics MA; Williges BH
    Hum Factors; 1988 Dec; 30(6):719-32. PubMed ID: 2976729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and tactual perception of syllable number in sentence stimuli.
    Bourgeois MS; Goldstein H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):367-71. PubMed ID: 6219145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of speakers' augmented characteristics and listeners' sex on intelligibility and acceptability of synthesized speech.
    Ellis LW; Spiegel B; Benjamin B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1081-8. PubMed ID: 12186228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The inverse problem for the vocal tract: numerical methods, acoustical experiments, and speech synthesis.
    Sondhi MM; Resnick JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Mar; 73(3):985-1002. PubMed ID: 6221042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Undergraduates' perceptions of three augmentative and alternative communication modes.
    Achmadi D; van der Meer L; Sigafoos J; Lancioni GE; O'Reilly MF; Lang R; Schlosser RW; Hodis F; Green VA; Sutherland D; McLay L; Marschik PB
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2015 Feb; 18(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 25279968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of speech generating devices can improve perception of qualifications for skilled, verbal, and interactive jobs.
    Stern SE; Chobany CM; Beam AA; Hoover BN; Hull TT; Linsenbigler M; Makdad-Light C; Rubright CN
    Work; 2017; 56(2):199-211. PubMed ID: 28211839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synthesized speech rate and pitch effects on intelligibility of warning messages for pilots.
    Simpson CA; Marchionda-Frost K
    Hum Factors; 1984 Oct; 26(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 6241175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST).
    Demers L; Weiss-Lambrou R; Ska B
    Assist Technol; 1996; 8(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 10159726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnitude-estimation scaling of computerized (digitized) speech under different listening conditions.
    Bettagere R; Fucci D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Jun; 88(3 Pt 2):1363-78. PubMed ID: 10485125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.