224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21372123)
41. Modality-specific perceptual expectations selectively modulate baseline activity in auditory, somatosensory, and visual cortices.
Langner R; Kellermann T; Boers F; Sturm W; Willmes K; Eickhoff SB
Cereb Cortex; 2011 Dec; 21(12):2850-62. PubMed ID: 21527785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The Role of Alpha Activity in Spatial and Feature-Based Attention.
van Diepen RM; Miller LM; Mazaheri A; Geng JJ
eNeuro; 2016; 3(5):. PubMed ID: 27822505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Two Spatially Distinct Posterior Alpha Sources Fulfill Different Functional Roles in Attention.
Sokoliuk R; Mayhew SD; Aquino KM; Wilson R; Brookes MJ; Francis ST; Hanslmayr S; Mullinger KJ
J Neurosci; 2019 Sep; 39(36):7183-7194. PubMed ID: 31341028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. From local inhibition to long-range integration: a functional dissociation of alpha-band synchronization across cortical scales in visuospatial attention.
Doesburg SM; Green JJ; McDonald JJ; Ward LM
Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1303():97-110. PubMed ID: 19782056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Dynamic activation of frontal, parietal, and sensory regions underlying anticipatory visual spatial attention.
Simpson GV; Weber DL; Dale CL; Pantazis D; Bressler SL; Leahy RM; Luks TL
J Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 31(39):13880-9. PubMed ID: 21957250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Individual differences in anticipatory mu rhythm modulation are associated with executive function and processing speed.
Meredith Weiss S; Laconi RN; Marshall PJ
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Oct; 20(5):901-916. PubMed ID: 32794102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Power and Phase of Alpha Oscillations Reveal an Interaction between Spatial and Temporal Visual Attention.
Kizuk SA; Mathewson KE
J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 29(3):480-494. PubMed ID: 28129063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Distinct roles of theta and alpha oscillations in the involuntary capture of goal-directed attention.
Harris AM; Dux PE; Jones CN; Mattingley JB
Neuroimage; 2017 May; 152():171-183. PubMed ID: 28274832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Attention and temporal expectations modulate power, not phase, of ongoing alpha oscillations.
van Diepen RM; Cohen MX; Denys D; Mazaheri A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1573-86. PubMed ID: 25774428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Peripheral Attentional Targets under Covert Attention Lead to Paradoxically Enhanced Alpha Desynchronization in Neurofibromatosis Type 1.
Silva G; Ribeiro MJ; Costa GN; Violante I; Ramos F; Saraiva J; Castelo-Branco M
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148600. PubMed ID: 26881921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Oscillatory recruitment of bilateral visual cortex during spatial attention to competing rhythmic inputs.
Gray MJ; Frey HP; Wilson TJ; Foxe JJ
J Neurosci; 2015 Apr; 35(14):5489-503. PubMed ID: 25855167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Oscillatory activity reflects differential use of spatial reference frames by sighted and blind individuals in tactile attention.
Schubert JT; Buchholz VN; Föcker J; Engel AK; Röder B; Heed T
Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 117():417-28. PubMed ID: 26032885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Spatial S-R compatibility with centrally presented stimuli. An event-related asymmetry study on dimensional overlap.
Wascher E; Reinhard M; Wauschkuhn B; Verleger R
J Cogn Neurosci; 1999 Mar; 11(2):214-29. PubMed ID: 10198136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Emergence of visual objects involves multiple stages of spatial selection.
Kasai T; Takeya R; Tanaka S
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):441-9. PubMed ID: 25425226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Diminished modulation of preparatory sensorimotor mu rhythm predicts attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder severity.
Ter Huurne N; Lozano-Soldevilla D; Onnink M; Kan C; Buitelaar J; Jensen O
Psychol Med; 2017 Aug; 47(11):1947-1956. PubMed ID: 28290271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Express attentional re-engagement but delayed entry into consciousness following invalid spatial cues in visual search.
Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
PLoS One; 2008; 3(12):e3967. PubMed ID: 19088847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.
Noonan MP; Adamian N; Pike A; Printzlau F; Crittenden BM; Stokes MG
J Neurosci; 2016 Feb; 36(6):1797-807. PubMed ID: 26865606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Cue-locked lateralized components in a tactile spatial attention task: Evidence for a functional dissociation between ADAN and LSN.
Gherri E; Gooray E; Forster B
Psychophysiology; 2016 Apr; 53(4):507-17. PubMed ID: 26695445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Visual Benefits in Apparent Motion Displays: Automatically Driven Spatial and Temporal Anticipation Are Partially Dissociated.
Ahrens MM; Veniero D; Gross J; Harvey M; Thut G
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144082. PubMed ID: 26623650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Anticipatory attentional suppression of visual features indexed by oscillatory alpha-band power increases: a high-density electrical mapping study.
Snyder AC; Foxe JJ
J Neurosci; 2010 Mar; 30(11):4024-32. PubMed ID: 20237273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
