379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21374698)
1. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Empirical evaluation suggests Copas selection model preferable to trim-and-fill method for selection bias in meta-analysis.
Schwarzer G; Carpenter J; Rücker G
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 19836925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the sensitivity of meta-analysis to selection bias: a multiple imputation approach.
Carpenter J; Rücker G; Schwarzer G
Biometrics; 2011 Sep; 67(3):1066-72. PubMed ID: 21039395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Capture-recapture is a potentially useful method for assessing publication bias.
Bennett DA; Latham NK; Stretton C; Anderson CS
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15135835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.
Harbord RM; Egger M; Sterne JA
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3443-57. PubMed ID: 16345038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry.
Biljana M; Jelena M; Branislav J; Milorad R
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():323-8. PubMed ID: 10724898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
Macaskill P; Walter SD; Irwig L
Stat Med; 2001 Feb; 20(4):641-54. PubMed ID: 11223905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using journal impact factors to correct for the publication bias of medical studies.
Baker R; Jackson D
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):785-92. PubMed ID: 16984321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
Ioannidis JP
J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How effective is St John's wort? The evidence revisited.
Werneke U; Horn O; Taylor DM
J Clin Psychiatry; 2004 May; 65(5):611-7. PubMed ID: 15163246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MMRM vs. LOCF: a comprehensive comparison based on simulation study and 25 NDA datasets.
Siddiqui O; Hung HM; O'Neill R
J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):227-46. PubMed ID: 19212876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analyses with binary outcomes: how many studies need to be omitted to detect a publication bias?
Saveleva E; Selinski S
J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2008; 71(13-14):845-50. PubMed ID: 18569583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
