BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21378093)

  • 1. Three-dimensional volume tomographic study of the imaging accuracy of impacted teeth: MSCT and CBCT comparison--an in vitro study.
    Hofmann E; Medelnik J; Fink M; Lell M; Hirschfelder U
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Jun; 35(3):286-94. PubMed ID: 21378093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring mesiodistal width of impacted maxillary canines: CT-assisted determination.
    Hofmann E; Medelnik J; Keller T; Steinhäuser S; Hirschfelder U
    J Orofac Orthop; 2011 Mar; 72(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 21484544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of the mesio-distal tooth width via 3D imaging techniques with and without ionizing radiation: CBCT, MSCT, and µCT versus MRI.
    Detterbeck A; Hofmeister M; Haddad D; Weber D; Schmid M; Hölzing A; Zabler S; Hofmann E; Hiller KH; Jakob P; Engel J; Hiller J; Hirschfelder U
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Jun; 39(3):310-319. PubMed ID: 27365182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging.
    Schegerer AA; Lechel U; Ritter M; Weisser G; Fink C; Brix G
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Oct; 49(10):675-84. PubMed ID: 24853071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A retrospective, semi-quantitative image quality analysis of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and MSCT in the diagnosis of distal radius fractures.
    Lang H; Neubauer J; Fritz B; Spira EM; Strube J; Langer M; Kotter E
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4551-4561. PubMed ID: 27003138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, micro-CT, and cone beam CT.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):e1-7. PubMed ID: 24325572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reliability of voxel gray values in cone beam computed tomography for preoperative implant planning assessment.
    Parsa A; Ibrahim N; Hassan B; Motroni A; van der Stelt P; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(6):1438-42. PubMed ID: 23189294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cone beam computed tomography-based models versus multislice spiral computed tomography-based models for assessing condylar morphology.
    Gomes LR; Gomes MR; Gonçalves JR; Ruellas AC; Wolford LM; Paniagua B; Benavides E; Cevidanes LH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Jan; 121(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 26679363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artifacts in orthodontic bracket systems in cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
    Hirschinger V; Hanke S; Hirschfelder U; Hofmann E
    J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Mar; 76(2):152-60, 162-3. PubMed ID: 25744093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of image quality and radiation dose of cone beam and low-dose multislice computed tomography--an in-vitro investigation.
    Hofmann E; Schmid M; Sedlmair M; Banckwitz R; Hirschfelder U; Lell M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2014 Jan; 18(1):301-11. PubMed ID: 23460022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A; Jacobs R; Fieuws S; Willems G
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in predicting the diameter of unerupted teeth.
    Nguyen E; Boychuk D; Orellana M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):e59-66. PubMed ID: 21803235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new method to measure mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth with volumetric cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Tong H; Enciso R; Van Elslande D; Major PW; Sameshima GT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 22748999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography on measuring impacted supernumerary teeth.
    Demiriz L; Hazar Bodrumlu E; İçen M; Durmuşlar MC
    Scanning; 2016 Nov; 38(6):579-584. PubMed ID: 26780989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finger fractures imaging: accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography.
    Faccioli N; Foti G; Barillari M; Atzei A; Mucelli RP
    Skeletal Radiol; 2010 Nov; 39(11):1087-95. PubMed ID: 20224906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cone Beam Computed Tomography vs Multislice Computed Tomography in Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacture Guided Implant Surgery Based on Three-Dimensional Optical Scanning and Stereolithographic Guides: Does Image Modality Matter?
    Widmann G; Fischer B; Berggren JP; Dennhardt A; Schullian P; Reto B; Puelacher W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(3):527-33. PubMed ID: 27183061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of gray values in CBCT and MSCT images for determination of density: influence of variation of FOV size.
    Rodrigues AF; Campos MJ; Chaoubah A; Fraga MR; Farinazzo Vitral RW
    Implant Dent; 2015 Apr; 24(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 25706259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-Dimensional Planning in Maxillofacial Fracture Surgery: Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacture Surgical Splints by Integrating Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Images Into Multislice Computerized Tomography Images.
    Ren J; Zhou Z; Li P; Tang W; Guo J; Wang H; Tian W
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 27(6):1415-9. PubMed ID: 27300464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography in diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial fractures in dried human skull: an in vitro study.
    Eskandarlou A; Poorolajal J; Talaeipour AR; Talebi S; Talaeipour M
    Dent Traumatol; 2014 Apr; 30(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 23826823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MSCT versus CBCT: evaluation of high-resolution acquisition modes for dento-maxillary and skull-base imaging.
    Dillenseger JP; Matern JF; Gros CI; Bornert F; Goetz C; Le Minor JM; Constantinesco A; Choquet P
    Eur Radiol; 2015 Feb; 25(2):505-15. PubMed ID: 25249315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.