These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2137864)

  • 1. Elaborative inferencing as an active or passive process.
    Garrod S; O'Brien EJ; Morris RK; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Mar; 16(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 2137864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elaborative inferences during reading: do they occur on-line?
    O'Brien EJ; Shank DM; Myers JL; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1988 Jul; 14(3):410-20. PubMed ID: 2969940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Explaining Reading Comprehension in Children With Developmental Language Disorder: The Importance of Elaborative Inferencing.
    Gough Kenyon SM; Palikara O; Lucas RM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Oct; 61(10):2517-2531. PubMed ID: 30286246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Resolution of activated background information in text comprehension.
    Wang R; Mo L; He X; Smythe I; Wang S
    Int J Psychol; 2010 Aug; 45(4):241-9. PubMed ID: 22044009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Working memory and inferences: evidence from eye fixations during reading.
    Calvo MG
    Memory; 2001; 9(4-6):365-81. PubMed ID: 11594358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age.
    Barnes MA; Dennis M; Haefele-Kalvaitis J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1996 Apr; 61(3):216-41. PubMed ID: 8636665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing children's inference generation: what do tests of reading comprehension measure?
    Bowyer-Crane C; Snowling MJ
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2005 Jun; 75(Pt 2):189-201. PubMed ID: 16033662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On-line evidence for elaborative logical inferences in text.
    Lea RB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Nov; 21(6):1469-82. PubMed ID: 7490577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selecting one among many referents in spatial situation models.
    Bower GH; Rinck M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Jan; 27(1):81-98. PubMed ID: 11204109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Working memory and inferences: Evidence from eye fixations during reading.
    Calvo MG
    Memory; 2001 Jul; 9(4):365-381. PubMed ID: 11747589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictive inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage.
    Lehman-Blake MT; Tompkins CA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Jun; 44(3):639-54. PubMed ID: 11407568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Individual Differences in Inference Generation: An ERP Analysis.
    George MS; Mannes S; Hoffman JE
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1997 Nov; 9(6):776-87. PubMed ID: 23964599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On-line predictive inferences in reading: processing time during versus after the priming context.
    Calvo MG; Castillo MD; Estevez A
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Sep; 27(5):834-43. PubMed ID: 10540812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Anaphoric inference during reading.
    O'Brien EJ; Duffy SA; Myers JL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1986 Jul; 12(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 2942624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linguistic Markers of Inference Generation While Reading.
    Clinton V; Carlson SE; Seipel B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Jun; 45(3):553-74. PubMed ID: 25833811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accessing situation model information: memory-based processing versus here-and-now accounts.
    Murray JD; Engle R
    J Psychol; 2005 May; 139(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 15945520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention to one word at a time in reading is still a viable hypothesis: rejoinder to Inhoff, Radach, and Eiter (2006).
    Pollatsek A; Reichle ED; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Dec; 32(6):1496-500. PubMed ID: 17154789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of foregrounding on readers' use of predictive inferences.
    Whitney P; Ritchie BG; Crane RS
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):424-32. PubMed ID: 1495404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online and offline inferential and textual processing of poor comprehenders: Evidence from a probing method.
    Yeari M; Elentok S; Schiff R
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Mar; 155():12-31. PubMed ID: 27894004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.