These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21380611)

  • 21. Do new objects capture attention?
    Franconeri SL; Hollingworth A; Simons DJ
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Apr; 16(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 15828974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Age-related deficits in guided search using cues.
    Gottlob LR
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 16953714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Focused spatial attention is independent of rapid resumption of an interrupted search.
    Lleras A; Enns JT
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):565-77. PubMed ID: 19304647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fractionating working memory: consolidation and maintenance are independent processes.
    Woodman GF; Vogel EK
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Feb; 16(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 15686576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lack of set size effects in spatial updating: Evidence for offline updating.
    Hodgson E; Waller D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):854-66. PubMed ID: 16822153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Binding objects to locations: the relationship between object files and visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Rasmussen IP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):543-64. PubMed ID: 20515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Representation of dynamic spatial configurations in visual short-term memory.
    Papenmeier F; Huff M; Schwan S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):397-415. PubMed ID: 22090188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection.
    Theeuwes J; Van der Burg E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Dec; 33(6):1335-51. PubMed ID: 18085947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Consolidation of multifeature items in visual working memory: central capacity requirements for visual consolidation.
    Stevanovski B; Jolicœur P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1108-19. PubMed ID: 21327744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Attention, awareness of contingencies, and control in spatial localization: a qualitative difference approach.
    Vaquero JM; Fiacconi C; Milliken B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1342-57. PubMed ID: 21038991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes.
    Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The spatial focus of attention is controlled at perceptual and cognitive levels.
    Caparos S; Linnell KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1080-107. PubMed ID: 20873935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A theory of dynamic occluded and illusory object perception.
    Palmer EM; Kellman PJ; Shipley TF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):513-41. PubMed ID: 17087570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Working memory, perceptual priming, and the perception of hierarchical forms: opposite effects of priming and working memory without memory refreshing.
    Kim JI; Humphreys GW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1533-55. PubMed ID: 20675799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The contents of perceptual hypotheses: evidence from rapid resumption of interrupted visual search.
    Jungé JA; Brady TF; Chun MM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):681-9. PubMed ID: 19429951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Updating of working memory: lingering bindings.
    Oberauer K; Vockenberg K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):967-87. PubMed ID: 19034717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The interaction between memorized objects and abrupt onsets in oculomotor capture.
    Wong JH; Peterson MS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1768-79. PubMed ID: 21533921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Spatial and visuospatial working memory tests predict performance in classic multiple-object tracking in young adults, but nonspatial measures of the executive do not.
    Trick LM; Mutreja R; Hunt K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Feb; 74(2):300-11. PubMed ID: 22076680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Object-based selection from spatially-invariant representations: evidence from a feature-report task.
    Matsukura M; Vecera SP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Feb; 73(2):447-57. PubMed ID: 21264725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.