299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21381014)
1. Anatomic location is a risk factor for atypical and malignant meningiomas.
Kane AJ; Sughrue ME; Rutkowski MJ; Shangari G; Fang S; McDermott MW; Berger MS; Parsa AT
Cancer; 2011 Mar; 117(6):1272-8. PubMed ID: 21381014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of the results of recurrent intracranial meningiomas treated with re-radiosurgery.
Kim M; Lee DH; Kim Rn HJ; Cho YH; Kim JH; Kwon DH
Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2017 Feb; 153():93-101. PubMed ID: 28081463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between tumor location, size, and WHO grade in meningioma.
Magill ST; Young JS; Chae R; Aghi MK; Theodosopoulos PV; McDermott MW
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Apr; 44(4):E4. PubMed ID: 29606048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk of Recurrence in Operated Parasagittal Meningiomas: A Logistic Binary Regression Model.
Escribano Mesa JA; Alonso Morillejo E; Parrón Carreño T; Huete Allut A; Narro Donate JM; Méndez Román P; Contreras Jiménez A; Pedrero García F; Masegosa González J
World Neurosurg; 2018 Feb; 110():e112-e118. PubMed ID: 29107168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three risk factors for WHO grade II and III meningiomas: A study of 1737 cases from a single center.
Zhou P; Ma W; Yin S; Li Y; Jiang S
Neurol India; 2013; 61(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 23466838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic value?
Voß KM; Spille DC; Sauerland C; Suero Molina E; Brokinkel C; Paulus W; Stummer W; Holling M; Jeibmann A; Brokinkel B
J Neurooncol; 2017 Jul; 133(3):641-651. PubMed ID: 28527009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Benign versus atypical meningiomas: risk factors predicting recurrence.
Nowak A; Dziedzic T; Krych P; Czernicki T; Kunert P; Marchel A
Neurol Neurochir Pol; 2015; 49(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25666766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Malignant potential of skull base versus non-skull base meningiomas: clinical series of 1,663 cases.
Cornelius JF; Slotty PJ; Steiger HJ; Hänggi D; Polivka M; George B
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2013 Mar; 155(3):407-13. PubMed ID: 23318687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is the Simpson Grading System Applicable to Estimate the Risk of Tumor Progression After Microsurgery for Recurrent Intracranial Meningioma?
Schipmann S; Schwake M; Sporns PB; Voß KM; Sicking J; Spille DC; Hess K; Paulus W; Stummer W; Brokinkel B
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e589-e597. PubMed ID: 30081236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Surgically resected skull base meningiomas demonstrate a divergent postoperative recurrence pattern compared with non-skull base meningiomas.
Mansouri A; Klironomos G; Taslimi S; Kilian A; Gentili F; Khan OH; Aldape K; Zadeh G
J Neurosurg; 2016 Aug; 125(2):431-40. PubMed ID: 26722844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Presenting Symptoms and Prognostic Factors for Symptomatic Outcomes Following Resection of Meningioma.
Wu A; Garcia MA; Magill ST; Chen W; Vasudevan HN; Perry A; Theodosopoulos PV; McDermott MW; Braunstein SE; Raleigh DR
World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e149-e159. PubMed ID: 29248774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Necrosis is a consistent factor to recurrence of meningiomas: should it be a stand-alone grading criterion for grade II meningioma?
Góes P; Santos BFO; Suzuki FS; Salles D; Stávale JN; Cavalheiro S; de Paiva Neto MA
J Neurooncol; 2018 Apr; 137(2):331-336. PubMed ID: 29270884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "Malignancy" in meningiomas: a clinicopathologic study of 116 patients, with grading implications.
Perry A; Scheithauer BW; Stafford SL; Lohse CM; Wollan PC
Cancer; 1999 May; 85(9):2046-56. PubMed ID: 10223247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of dural detachment on long-term tumor control for meningiomas treated using Simpson grade IV resection.
Fukushima Y; Oya S; Nakatomi H; Shibahara J; Hanakita S; Tanaka S; Shin M; Kawai K; Fukayama M; Saito N
J Neurosurg; 2013 Dec; 119(6):1373-9. PubMed ID: 24053497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. WHO grade of intracranial meningiomas differs with respect to patient's age, location, tumor size and peritumoral edema.
Ressel A; Fichte S; Brodhun M; Rosahl SK; Gerlach R
J Neurooncol; 2019 Nov; 145(2):277-286. PubMed ID: 31578671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Distinguishing grade I meningioma from higher grade meningiomas without biopsy.
Varlotto J; Flickinger J; Pavelic MT; Specht CS; Sheehan JM; Timek DT; Glantz MJ; Sogge S; Dimaio C; Moser R; Yunus S; Fitzgerald TJ; Upadhyay U; Rava P; Tangel M; Yao A; Kanekar S
Oncotarget; 2015 Nov; 6(35):38421-8. PubMed ID: 26472106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Simpson grading revisited: aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management.
Gousias K; Schramm J; Simon M
J Neurosurg; 2016 Sep; 125(3):551-60. PubMed ID: 26824369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Brain invasion assessability in meningiomas is related to meningioma size and grade, and can be improved by extensive sampling of the surgically removed meningioma specimen.
Pizem J; Velnar T; Prestor B; Mlakar J; Popovic M
Clin Neuropathol; 2014; 33(5):354-63. PubMed ID: 25034703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term surgical outcomes of spinal meningiomas.
Nakamura M; Tsuji O; Fujiyoshi K; Hosogane N; Watanabe K; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Toyama Y; Chiba K; Matsumoto M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 May; 37(10):E617-23. PubMed ID: 22146282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical features and treatment of World Health Organization grade II and III meningiomas in childhood: report of 23 cases.
Wang XQ; Jiang CC; Zhao L; Gong Y; Hu J; Chen H
J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2012 Nov; 10(5):423-33. PubMed ID: 22938082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
