These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21381394)

  • 1. [Structural activity relationship approaches for assessing genotoxicity].
    Honma M
    Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 2010; (128):39-43. PubMed ID: 21381394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Chemical structure of mutagens and carcinogens and the relationship with biological activity.
    Benigni R
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2004 Mar; 23(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 15149144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modelling of the carcinogenic risk of nitroso compounds using regression analysis and the TOPS-MODE approach.
    Helguera AM; Pérez-Machado G; Cordeiro MN; Combes RD
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Apr; 21(3-4):277-304. PubMed ID: 20544552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive models for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: frameworks, state-of-the-art, and perspectives.
    Benfenati E; Benigni R; Demarini DM; Helma C; Kirkland D; Martin TM; Mazzatorta P; Ouédraogo-Arras G; Richard AM; Schilter B; Schoonen WG; Snyder RD; Yang C
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2009 Apr; 27(2):57-90. PubMed ID: 19412856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computational prediction of genotoxicity: room for improvement.
    Snyder RD; Smith MD
    Drug Discov Today; 2005 Aug; 10(16):1119-24. PubMed ID: 16182197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of structure-activity relationship and artificial intelligence systems to improve in silico prediction of ames test mutagenicity.
    Mazzatorta P; Tran LA; Schilter B; Grigorov M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 17238246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Henderson L; Müller L
    Mutat Res; 2005 Jul; 584(1-2):1-256. PubMed ID: 15979392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the OECD (Q)SAR Application Toolbox and Toxtree for predicting and profiling the carcinogenic potential of chemicals.
    Mombelli E; Devillers J
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2010 Oct; 21(7-8):731-52. PubMed ID: 21120759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of structure-activity relationship analysis in the food contact notification program.
    Bailey AB; Chanderbhan R; Collazo-Braier N; Cheeseman MA; Twaroski ML
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Jul; 42(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 15935536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. (Q)SAR Methods for Predicting Genotoxicity and Carcinogenicity: Scientific Rationale and Regulatory Frameworks.
    Bossa C; Benigni R; Tcheremenskaia O; Battistelli CL
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1800():447-473. PubMed ID: 29934905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structure-activity relationships for the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of simple and alpha-beta unsaturated aldehydes.
    Benigni R; Passerini L; Rodomonte A
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2003; 42(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 14556221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Use of computer-assisted prediction of toxic effects of chemical substances.
    Simon-Hettich B; Rothfuss A; Steger-Hartmann T
    Toxicology; 2006 Jul; 224(1-2):156-62. PubMed ID: 16707203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alternatives to the carcinogenicity bioassay: in silico methods, and the in vitro and in vivo mutagenicity assays.
    Benigni R; Bossa C; Tcheremenskaia O; Giuliani A
    Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 6(7):809-19. PubMed ID: 20438313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
    Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simple and alpha,beta-unsaturated aldehydes: correct prediction of genotoxic activity through structure-activity relationship models.
    Benigni R; Conti L; Crebelli R; Rodomonte A; Vari' MR
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2005 Dec; 46(4):268-80. PubMed ID: 15991240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategy for genotoxicity testing--metabolic considerations.
    Ku WW; Bigger A; Brambilla G; Glatt H; Gocke E; Guzzie PJ; Hakura A; Honma M; Martus HJ; Obach RS; Roberts S;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):59-77. PubMed ID: 17141553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the toxic effects of ethylene glycol ethers using Quantitative Structure Toxicity Relationship models.
    Ruiz P; Mumtaz M; Gombar V
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2011 Jul; 254(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 21034757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.