These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21381434)

  • 1. A robust statistical method to detect null alleles in microsatellite and SNP datasets in both panmictic and inbred populations.
    Girard P
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2011; 10():Article 9. PubMed ID: 21381434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum likelihood estimation of individual inbreeding coefficients and null allele frequencies.
    Hall N; Mercer L; Phillips D; Shaw J; Anderson AD
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):151-61. PubMed ID: 22805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Population genetics of autopolyploids under a mixed mating model and the estimation of selfing rate.
    Hardy OJ
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):103-17. PubMed ID: 25981126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performing Parentage Analysis in the Presence of Inbreeding and Null Alleles.
    Huang K; Mi R; Dunn DW; Wang T; Li B
    Genetics; 2018 Dec; 210(4):1467-1481. PubMed ID: 30337340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous estimation of null alleles and inbreeding coefficients.
    Chybicki IJ; Burczyk J
    J Hered; 2009; 100(1):106-13. PubMed ID: 18936113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of power and accuracy of methods for detection and frequency-estimation of null alleles.
    Girard P; Angers B
    Genetica; 2008 Oct; 134(2):187-97. PubMed ID: 18060508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different genetic distances to test isolation by distance between populations.
    Séré M; Thévenon S; Belem AMG; De Meeûs T
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Aug; 119(2):55-63. PubMed ID: 28537571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pedigree and marker information requirements to monitor genetic variability.
    Baumung R; Sölkner J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2003; 35(4):369-83. PubMed ID: 12927072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation.
    Chapuis MP; Estoup A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Mar; 24(3):621-31. PubMed ID: 17150975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability assessment of null allele detection: inconsistencies between and within different methods.
    Dąbrowski MJ; Pilot M; Kruczyk M; Żmihorski M; Umer HM; Gliwicz J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Mar; 14(2):361-73. PubMed ID: 24119056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating relatedness and inbreeding using molecular markers and pedigrees: the effect of demographic history.
    Robinson SP; Simmons LW; Kennington WJ
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Dec; 22(23):5779-92. PubMed ID: 24102888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficiency of the inbreeding coefficient f and other estimators in detecting null alleles, as revealed by empirical data of locus oke3 across 65 populations of chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta.
    Zhivotovsky LA; Kordicheva SY; Shaikhaev EG; Rubtsova GA; Afanasiev KI; Shitova MV; Fuller SA; Shaikhaev GO; Gharrett AJ
    J Fish Biol; 2015 Jan; 86(1):402-8. PubMed ID: 25424881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recent progress and challenges in population genetics of polyploid organisms: an overview of current state-of-the-art molecular and statistical tools.
    Dufresne F; Stift M; Vergilino R; Mable BK
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jan; 23(1):40-69. PubMed ID: 24188632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sampling for microsatellite-based population genetic studies: 25 to 30 individuals per population is enough to accurately estimate allele frequencies.
    Hale ML; Burg TM; Steeves TE
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45170. PubMed ID: 22984627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of microsatellite null alleles on assignment testing.
    Carlsson J
    J Hered; 2008; 99(6):616-23. PubMed ID: 18535000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A maximum-likelihood method to correct for allelic dropout in microsatellite data with no replicate genotypes.
    Wang C; Schroeder KB; Rosenberg NA
    Genetics; 2012 Oct; 192(2):651-69. PubMed ID: 22851645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marker-based investigation of inbreeding depression in the endangered species Brassica insularis.
    Glémin S; Vimond L; Ronfort J; Bataillon T; Mignot A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2006 Oct; 97(4):304-11. PubMed ID: 16850037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unbiased estimator for genetic drift and effective population size.
    Jorde PE; Ryman N
    Genetics; 2007 Oct; 177(2):927-35. PubMed ID: 17720927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome-wide SSR-based association mapping for fiber quality in nation-wide upland cotton inbreed cultivars in China.
    Nie X; Huang C; You C; Li W; Zhao W; Shen C; Zhang B; Wang H; Yan Z; Dai B; Wang M; Zhang X; Lin Z
    BMC Genomics; 2016 May; 17():352. PubMed ID: 27177443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.