These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21381844)
1. Predictive and incremental validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide scores with male and female jail inmates. Hastings ME; Krishnan S; Tangney JP; Stuewig J Psychol Assess; 2011 Mar; 23(1):174-83. PubMed ID: 21381844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) to predict in-prison aggressive behavior in a Swiss offender population. Endrass J; Rossegger A; Frischknecht A; Noll T; Urbaniok F Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 17615429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Further evidence of the divergent correlates of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory factors: prediction of institutional misconduct among male prisoners. Edens JF; Poythress NG; Lilienfeld SO; Patrick CJ; Test A Psychol Assess; 2008 Mar; 20(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18315404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Testing the predictive validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in relation to inmate misconduct and violence. Reidy TJ; Sorensen JR; Davidson M Psychol Assess; 2016 Aug; 28(8):871-84. PubMed ID: 26460899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Major mental illness and violence history as predictors of institutional misconduct and recidivism: main and interaction effects. Walters GD; Crawford G Law Hum Behav; 2014 Jun; 38(3):238-47. PubMed ID: 24127894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A cross-validation of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised (VRAG-R) within a correctional sample. Glover AJJ; Churcher FP; Gray AL; Mills JF; Nicholson DE Law Hum Behav; 2017 Dec; 41(6):507-518. PubMed ID: 28782966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) in predicting criminal recidivism. Kröner C; Stadtland C; Eidt M; Nedopil N Crim Behav Ment Health; 2007; 17(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17295202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incremental validity analyses of the violence risk appraisal guide and the psychopathy checklist: screening version in a civil psychiatric sample. Edens JF; Skeem JL; Douglas KS Assessment; 2006 Sep; 13(3):368-74. PubMed ID: 16880286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting Institutional Aggression in Offenders with Intellectual Disabilities Using the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide. Pouls C; Jeandarme I J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2018 Mar; 31(2):e265-e271. PubMed ID: 27990764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recidivism in female offenders: PCL-R lifestyle factor and VRAG show predictive validity in a German sample. Eisenbarth H; Osterheider M; Nedopil N; Stadtland C Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(5):575-84. PubMed ID: 22718134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Establishing construct and predictive validity of the prison inmate inventory for use with female inmates. Degiorgio L Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2015 Feb; 59(2):196-210. PubMed ID: 24122019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychopathy and recidivism among female inmates. Salekin RT; Rogers R; Ustad KL; Sewell KW Law Hum Behav; 1998 Feb; 22(1):109-28. PubMed ID: 9487793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posttraumatic stress, panic disorder, violence, and recidivism among local jail detainees. Combs E; Guston K; Kopak A; Raggio A; Hoffmann NG Int J Prison Health; 2019 Dec; 15(4):366-375. PubMed ID: 31532342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of and revision to the VRAG and SORAG: the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide-Revised (VRAG-R). Rice ME; Harris GT; Lang C Psychol Assess; 2013 Sep; 25(3):951-65. PubMed ID: 23647040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postdicting arrests for proactive and reactive aggression with the PICTS Proactive and Reactive composite scales. Walters GD; Frederick AA; Schlauch C J Interpers Violence; 2007 Nov; 22(11):1415-30. PubMed ID: 17925290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors for institutional misconduct among incarcerated women: an examination of the criterion-related validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory. Skopp NA; Edens JF; Ruiz MA J Pers Assess; 2007 Feb; 88(1):106-17. PubMed ID: 17266421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Gender-responsiveness in corrections: Estimating female inmate misconduct risk using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Davidson M; Sorensen JR; Reidy TJ Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 26436333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gender differences in risk factors for violence: an examination of the predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth. Penney SR; Lee Z; Moretti MM Aggress Behav; 2010; 36(6):390-404. PubMed ID: 20623508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-Validation of the Revised Version of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a Sample of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses. Gregório Hertz P; Eher R; Etzler S; Rettenberger M Sex Abuse; 2021 Feb; 33(1):63-87. PubMed ID: 31010400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth as a predictor of recidivism in a United Kingdom cohort of adolescent offenders with conduct disorder. Dolan MC; Rennie CE Psychol Assess; 2008 Mar; 20(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 18315397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]